|
|
.Sport
Try
Again
AFRUs
mixed fortunes
Volume 48, No. 10, June 15, 2006
 |
|
ENGAGING:
Air Force and Army pack down into the scrum during their
encounter.
|
|
Photo by Doc Doherty
|
THE
new-look Air Force Rugby Union (AFRU) team experienced mixed fortunes
in playing well but losing both its Australian Services
Rugby Championship matches in Canberra on May 28 and 30.
The team that lost its opener to Navy 15-32 at Vikings Park Erindale
was very different to that so easily outclassed at last years
titles.
It then battled valiantly and showed spirit in trying to replicate
the effort and contain the powerful Army unit in game two at Erindale.
It largely held its own for a good deal of the first half to trail
6-29 at the break before losing 11-60.
For the first time in years, Air Forces scrum outclassed
their more-fancied Navy opponents with superior technique and
drive, forcing several scrum penalties and a tighthead feed.
Lapses in concentration, particularly out wide in broken play,
leaked two tries in the first 20 minutes for a 22-0 lead to Navy.
Vikings fullback CPL James Hood handled twice in phase-play
for Air Force to score a powerful solo try in the corner for a
5-22 deficit.
Air Force controlled the next 30 minutes, with the forwards continually
crossing the advantage line, the scrum dominating and flanker
LAC Ryan Baden securing consistent quality ball at the lineout.
Fly-half LAC Bryan Hudsons penalty closed the gap and Air
Force converted pressure into points when veteran prop FSGT Jason
Ryans try was converted to bring the score back to 22-15.
Air Force then tired noticeably as Navy kept the ball in close,
making good ground upfield before swinging it wide to both flanks
to probe for holes. Air Forces desperate, scrambling defence
held until the 60-minute mark despite being caught short out wide.
The much-maligned scrum of the past dominated, with front-rowers
FSGT Ryan, CPL Scott McKenzie and hooker LAC Richard Falkenmire
inspirational in the vanguard.
Blind-side flanker LAC Baden was in sparkling form and was the
standout Air Force player.
Air Forces consistency in the set-pieces allowed for exciting
backline play, though in broken play there was not quite the same
vision and a great deal of dropped ball.
Air Forces best included CPL Hood, winger/fullback FLGOFF
Darwin Natano, winger PLTOFF Brayden Pirlo and replacement back
LAC Paul Hampson.
Against Army, Air Force showed early endeavour, but the ball rarely
proceeded past the inside backs, though OFFCDT Ryan Kouvelis and
LAC Paul Hampson made incisive runs.
Dropped ball, wayward passes and a strong display by the Army
pack at the breakdowns secured possession and gave a slick Army
backline ample chances to show its style. This produced five first-half
tries, four of them to classy winger CFN Neil Campbell.
Air Force had led 6-5 after 21 minutes thanks to two penalty goals
from LAC Ryan Espie and began the second half with renewed endeavour,
rewarded by a try to LAC Falkenmire, who burrowed over out wide
off an Espie pass after about 55 minutes.
Air Force was best served by LAC Espie, LAC Hampson, OFFCDT Kouvelis,
LAC Baden, FSGT Ryan and CPL McKenzie.
Air Force head coach, SGT Adam Campaign, was basically happy with
the way his young team performed against Navy.
We are probably still five percent from where we need to
be to win these games, he said. With 15 minutes to
go and down by a converted try, the game was there to be won.
Next time we need to make sure that we finish with more authority.
Now, rather than trying to make up huge ground on Navy and
Army, it is down to much smaller percentages.
While disappointed with the result against Army, SGT Campaign
felt Air Force had much to build on. The late withdrawals of the
injured Hood and Pirlo had proved disruptive and the lack of depth
in the backs had hurt Air Force.
Fitness was a telling point; they were a much fitter side,
SGT Campaign said.
After a strong first 26 minutes our fitness dropped away,
we were off our game plan a little and let that
aggression get away from us.
We let them dictate the pace of play, not taking our time
and space.
|
| |
|
|

.
|
|