|
|
.Entertainment
 |
| Stirling's
Men |
| Gavin
Mortimer, Weidenfeld
and Nicolson |
|
376pp, $49.95 |
|
 |
Historys
infamous moments and people immortalised
DONT
expect a sweeping analysis of the British Armys
most hyped and famous Special Forces when you read Gavin
Mortimers inside story of the original SAS in
World War II.
This is very much a collection of war stories and anecdotes,
based on more than 60 interviews with members of the
SAS who served in North Africa, Italy, France and Germany.
The focus is not just on the SASs founder, David
Stirling, and his successor, the legendary Paddy Mayne
(who clearly was psychotic), but on the troopers who
did the hard yards.
Although the publishers dust jacket notes says
it is not a story of derring do, thats exactly
what the author has produced in prose which lurches
from Boys Own Annual clichés of killing
the nasty Nazis to workman-like sentences that just
tell the story.
There is no doubt that the soldiers who joined the SAS
were not your run-of-the mill infantry being
able to operate independently, not being afraid of rank
structures and more than average capabilities with weapons
were crucial.
Stirlings Men does show that what began as a typical
school-boyish exercise gradually evolved into a regular
Army unit that practised asymmetrical warfare long before
some clever chap put an academic title on it.
Such was the German perception of the SAS that Hitler
ordered any SAS trooper captured to be shot in cold
blood.
For those who like stories of brave lads surviving training
then doing their bit blowing up bridges, knifing the
Hun and drinking themselves insensible while on leave,
then this is for you.
David Sibley
|
| Armageddon |
Max
Hastings,
Pan
Macmillan |
|
500pp,
$25 |
|
 |
WHEN
a books prose is crisp, chock-full of anecdotes,
quotes and astute, concise judgments based on excellent
research, then its hard to put down.
English journalist and historian Max Hastings is one
such writer. He proves that military history should
be written in such a way to engage the reader in an
area of history which, at first, might not seem worth
reading.
In Armageddon, Hastings tells the story of the fall
of the Third Reich over the eight months following D-Day
on June 6, 1944. His line of attack is to tell the story
and highlight the reasons why the Wehrmacht fought so
hard and had to delay the inevitable fall of Hitlers
demonic regime.
Dont think that Hastings is a revisionist right-wing
historian perversely dazzled by the Germans. Although
he is very respectful and honest about the technical
abilities of the German Army and judges it to be the
most formidable of the armies which fought over Europe
in terms of training, skills and dedication, his writing
spares no Germans, especially the generals, over their
moral cowardice, vacuity and willingness to be complicit
in the terrible war crimes of the Nazis.
He also does not shirk from the horrific war crimes
of the Russians in taking vengeance when they invaded
East Prussia, the first German province to be destroyed
by the Red Army. The systematic and dreadful raping
of German women by Soviet soldiers is not ignored.
Hastings is particularly strong in analysing the mistakes
of American and British senior commanders in prolonging
the war on the Western Front. In particular, the Allied
defeat at Arnhem and the American blunders in front
of Aachen and in the Hurtgen Forest are examined.
But the strength of Armageddon is the balance between
telling the battle narrative, the strategic overview
and the ordinary stories of the soldiers and civilians
of all sides in the last period of the war in Europe.
Armageddon is a welcome addition to any library on World
War II.
David Sibley
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|

.
|
|