The
fix is quick for ROG
By
PTE John Wellfare
|
|
| * |
 |
Some
key recommendations of the redress of grievance
review are:
reducing the average complaint-handling
times;
employing more people to clear the backlog
of applications;
providing clearer guidance and better
advice to COs and to people submitting ROGs.
|
|
|
|
RESOLVING
a redress of grievance will be quicker in the future, with CDF
and the Ombudsman accepting a number of recommendations from a
review into the process.
Staff from the Ombudsmans office and Defence conducted the
review, commissioned in September last year, and the team sought
input from many ADF members, including some of those who had lodged
complaints.
Di Harris, the director of the Complaint Resolution Agency (CRA),
which has oversight of the redress system, said the review had
paved the way for the agency to take on more staff and resolve
complaints more quickly.
If you talk about redresses to people, anyone whos
had anything to do with the process, almost without exception,
will say it takes a long time, she said.
Recruitment of more staff to work within the agency will begin
soon. The extra staff will help to clear the backlog of redress
of grievance applications and reduce complaint-handling timeframes
in the future.
As part of the revamp, members are also being encouraged to resolve
their complaints at the lowest possible levels by using their
chain of command or Defences alternative dispute resolution,
mediation and administrative schemes. But members will always
retain the right to seek formal resolution.
CDF General Peter Cosgrove said now that the review was complete
he was confident that ADF members would shortly notice a marked
improvement in complaint handling turnaround.
I can also assure ADF members that their complaints will
continue to be handled thoroughly and impartially, he said.
Ms Harris said the review proposed that the CRA work more closely
with ADF units to provide advice on investigating redress of grievance
applications.
Commanders might only get one or two redresses in their
time as a CO, but in CRA we get about 200 a year and weve
got people whove worked here for five or six years, so theres
a lot of corporate knowledge and experience available, she
said.
Ms Harris said the Agencys greatest strength that
it operates separate from the chain of command would be
preserved under the reviews recommendations.
When this organisation was established it was set up to
be independent and so we work directly for the CDF, she
said. CRA reviews each case without fear or favour and makes
recommendations based on merit. If this means taking a stand against
policy or a Service HQ decision, so be it.
GEN Cosgrove said implementing the review recommendations was
another step in enhancing the military justice system. The
submissions gave the review team valuable insight into the issues
affecting complainants and I wish to thank those ADF members who
contributed, he said.