|
|
| Features
- Air Power Conference |
Networked
force in practise
How
might a networked force operate?
This scenario of a deployment in 2015 gives an idea.
 |
|
CPL
David Thomas and CPL Craig Whiteman prepare Hornets for
the final combat mission in Iraq. The Hornets were critical
to the Air Force’s success in the MEAO, but we can still
learn from how we used them.
|
IN
RESPONSE to an emergency, the Government directs the ADF to respond
in support of a host nation, who has asked for assistance.
Navy, Army and Air Force elements are individually deployed but,
through NCW systems, link as a seamless force.
The force is designed, built, and skilled for integrated, networked
operations that make today’s joint ops seem clumsy. All of the
actors – air, land and sea – are using the same operational picture,
with their view of the conflict-space customised to need.
Strategic, operational and tactical level data is fed into the
information grid via a multi-level security system that ensures
our decision makers, operators and support people get what they
need.
Despite the seeming complexity of the net, command and control
is simplified. All understand the intent of the operation as
it unfolds, ensuring a focus on the objective, enhancing sustainment,
and reducing the possibility of fratricide.
The Air Force deployment is carefully packaged. Our ISR assets
have been building a physical and electronic picture of the battlespace.
A JSF package, Airborne Early Warning and Control and tankers
go in next.
The initial action is removing the adversary’s command and control
and ground-based air defence systems using on-board electronic
warfare systems to jam and deceive, and air-launched, long-range
stand-off weapons targeted through AEW&C and unmanned platforms
to disable and destroy.
JSF continues on to control the air over the area of operations
– able to switch from offensive to defensive ops.
Once an air perimeter is secured, an expeditionary combat support
squadron moves to establish an operating base and forward force
elements deploy.
The force has a small footprint in theatre.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, based to the rear, monitor the area
of ops and report enemy moves while feeding the fused conflict-space
picture.
The UAVs are backed up by multimission aircraft. With a pair of
UAVs, we are able to loiter over the area of interest with a selected
suite of sensors to give us continuous coverage.
JSF now maintains air superiority and switches modes quickly to
attack ground targets when necessary, using stealth, EW and precision
weapons.
Auto target cuing and prioritisation between platforms – air,
ground and sea – is available for the area of ops, including for
targets of opportunity.
The Jindalee Over-the-Horizon Radar Network, AEW&C, the multi-mission
aircraft, UAVs, Special Forces, surface and sub-surface maritime
platforms, and allied and commercial space assets link to provide
seamless, continuous coverage of the operational environment and
provide essential communications links to support command and
control and force sustainment.
As well, vital support is provided by industry and embedded contractors.
Lessons
from Iraq
The experience in Iraq highlighted some important
trends.
THE
first trend to consider is the flexibility our air power brought
to the battle, noting air superiority was established from the
outset.
Our F/A-18s were dual use systems – they could be quickly switched
from air-to-air roles to air-to-ground roles, sometimes in the
same mission, to meet any immediate threat or provide a rapid
response to meet the Joint Commander’s requirements.
Tankers were critical. Without them, none of the coalition could
have operated over Iraq. Back home in Australia, we need tankers
to overcome the tyranny of distance for transit and strike, and
to increase on-station times for supported platforms.
We will need to continue to invest in flexible, high-end systems
to allow Government a range of options. Examples are the procurement
of systems such as Airborne Early Warning and Control and the
Vigilaire command and control infrastructure which will allow
us to network:
- our
fighter and strike systems;
-
our tankers;
-
our intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance unmanned aerial
vehicles;
-
our surface assets such the Air Warfare Destroyers the Navy is
acquiring;
-
our Army ground and air elements, and so on.
Second,
in the Gulf our fighters carried only precision weapons – no
“dumb” bombs. In the latest Gulf War up to 70 per cent of the
total munitions dropped were precision guided as opposed to only
8 per cent in the first Gulf War.
We
have come a long way in 10 years. In addition, many of these modern
weapons were not hampered by smoke, dust storms or cloud cover.
Nearly all tanks and artillery sitting in the open were destroyed
from the air. In this vein, we look to further developing our
precision and stand-off weapons for all our combat aircraft.
Ultimately, NCW will allow the near real-time target-selection
and acquisition needed to deal with mobile threats.
I might add that dumb bombs are also operationally-and costeffective
in particular scenarios, and should not be written out of the
analysis yet, if ever.
Third, was the value of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
that allowed the coalition to “see” the battlefield real-time,
in all weather, night and day.
That meant that the Iraqi regime and their fielded forces were
pinned down. Every time they made a move they were hit, even,
for example, during a dust storm they were attempting to hide
in.
All of this shows that we are on the right track in Australia
with the further development of systems such as JORN and the AP-3Cs
and investment in many new capabilities like Wedgetail, unmanned
aerial vehicles and Vigilaire.
Again, we will network all these systems to gain even greater
benefits.
Fourth, and finally, is the value of electronic warfare selfprotection
equipment.
We have fitted such devices to our deployed C-130H and C-130J
aircraft, which mitigates the risk of them operating in a high-threat
environment rife with surface to air missiles and small arms fire.
Electronic warfare self-protection extended their operational
envelope, and we are just not effective without it.
|
| |
|
|

.
|
|