|
Making
it easier to join forces
Office of Interoperability formed
By
Leesha Furse
 |
|
US,
British and Australian personnel stand together. Trust and
understanding make for more effective interoperability.
|
INTEROPERABILITY
between the ADF and US forces is set to evolve to a higher level.
The Office of Interoperability has been established to ensure
a concerted effort makes it easier for the ADF’s three services
to work together, as well as with the military forces of other
countries, particularly the US.
The Office of Interoperability was set up on July 1 after Defence
Minister Robert Hill and US Secretary for Defense Donald Rumsfeld
agreed to the recommendations of the strategic and operational
level reviews of interoperability between the Australian and the
US forces. The reviews were initially commissioned in 2001.
The Director General of Interoperability, Air Commodore David
Pietsch, said recent coalition experience had shown that interoperability
was “absolutely critical” to achieving combat outcomes in coalition
operations.
“Equipment is only part of it. It’s an important part of it, but
there’s training, there is exercising together and there is the
building of understanding and trust between people in both forces
so that at short notice we can contribute and we can come together
as partners in a coalition and be combat-effective,” AIRCDRE Pietsch
said.
While the ADF’s equipment, tactics, training and culture need
to be compatible with those of the US armed forces, it is the
trust between ADF members and their American counterparts that
will continue to be the deciding factor in how successful the
two militaries are when working together.
Commander Chris Stephens, one of two Directors of Interoperability,
said trust was the underlying principle of interoperability, and
this was important when considering the inevitable military posting
cycle and the potential loss of corporate knowledge between individuals
who had built up a close professional relationship.
“Recent operations have demonstrated that it’s the personal relationships
that develop between the soldiers, the sailors and the airmen
that actually empower interoperability.
|
What
is interoperability?
|
|
Interoperability
issues include joint, combined and coalition operations,
activities and information sharing policies.
|
|
Why
has the office been formed?
|
|
In
July 2001 the then Defence Minister and the US Secretary
of Defense commissioned a review of the interoperability
between their armed forces. Two reports were later issued,
one at a strategic level and one at an operational level.
The strategic level review was accepted in October 2002.
Three weeks ago the operational level review was accepted.
|
|
What
will the office do?
|
|
Oversee and coordinate the implementation of the Strategic
and Operational Level Interoperability Reviews and their
recommendations. Nine recommendations have been identified
for implementation by 2006.
|
|
Address issues concerning interoperability with the US and
other potential coalition partners, including New Zealand,
Canada and the UK.
|
|
Maintain
effective liaison with appropriate US combatant and unified
commands and agencies.
|
|
Ensure changes to the Defence Capability Plan consider the
office’s work.
|
|
Chair
meetings and prepare and contribute to reports on the work
of the office.
|
|
Who
makes up the team?
|
|
AIRCDRE
David Pietsch
COL Mike Goodyer
CMDR Chris Stephens,
RANR An APS officer to be advised
|
You
can have the same equipment, the same tactics and procedures,
but if there’s no trust between the operators then it’s really
difficult to make it work,” CMDR Stephens said.
“The Navy’s been in the Gulf now for almost a decade and the Air
Force has been working with US squadrons for decades. In the case
of the Air Force, they can seamlessly fit into each other’s air
tasking arrangements.
“One of the things we kept hearing from our US allies ... was
that they couldn’t believe the high quality of our junior personnel
and the high degree of leadership they displayed.
And because of our leadership and ability, the ADF is held in
very high regard.” He said the benefit of interoperability was
that the “warfighters – the soldiers, the sailors and the airmen
who actually conduct the fighting – get all the information that
they need to do their job”. “The information just appears when
you need it, where you need it.
[For example] in the case of a soldier conducting firefights,
his platoon commander has all the information he or she needs
to carry that firefight to the bad guys.
It doesn’t matter whether it [the information] comes from an American
satellite, an Australian special forces observer who’s 50 miles
clear ahead of them or a ship at sea,” CMDR Stephens said.
AIRCDRE Pietsch said Link 16 – which has been planned for many
years for the Air Force – would be available in the next couple
of years. It will draw on data gathered by Australian and coalition
forces to provide aircrew and air controllers with a comprehensive
tactical picture.
“Basically, you can put information up on the display screen in
an aeroplane, which we’ve never been able to do before. It’s graphic
information so rather than someone telling you there’s individual
aircraft 200 miles to the left, it actually comes up on the screen.
It links the combat aircraft with the supporting aircraft and
with the ground environment, all of whom are working from a common
operating picture,” he said.
AIRCDRE Pietsch said interoperability had to be continually addressed.
“One doesn’t get to be interoperable and then stop.
It is an ongoing process. Interoperability is very easy to lose
and consequently it must continually be attended to.
You can lose it from a technical perspective, a techniques perspective,
a tactics perspectives and, importantly, a cultural and trust
perspective.
Our task is to ensure that we maintain and, where appropriate,
enhance our current levels of interoperability with our allies.”
The main task of the Office of Interoperability is to work closely
with its US counterpart, which has been established in US Pacific Command, to progress the issues which have been raised as a
result of two reviews into interoperability by Australia and the
US.
While the office’s charter is focused on the US, our warfighters
conduct regular exercises with Australia’s regional partners,
improving interoperability with them as well.
|