|
|
Top
Stories
|
Balanced
innovation
 |
|
Temporary
wiring like this during propeller balancing of C-130Js should
soon be a thing of the past.
|
THE
Defence Science and Technology Organisations exploration of
the potential to use the C-130J on-board engine monitoring system
for propeller balancing has attracted interest from the aircrafts
manufacturers and the US military.
The innovation should save operational costs for our Air Force and
other countries that fly the C-130J.
The Air Force will present its findings to the next C-130 Joint
Users Group (JUG) in June after final trials at RAAF Base Richmond
this month. The recommendation is expected to be that future system
software upgrades incorporate the balancing procedure, according
to DSTOs senior research scientist, Brian Rebbechi.
Air Force engineers and maintainers from No. 37 Squadron and
ALSPO [the Air Lift Systems Program Office] are leading the conceptual
design of the new system through their involvement in the Aircraft
Data Diagnostics System Working Group of the JUG, Mr Rebbechi
said. The overall impact will be reduced maintenance hours
and costs because neither the acquisition of supplementary hardware
nor ground running will be required.
Propeller balancing is a necessary part of operating turboprop aircraft
and aims to reduce vibration throughout the airframe. Operators
of the C-130H aircraft are accustomed to the time-consuming and
laborious installation of temporary wiring and sensors to carry
out the task.
About 18 months ago, we questioned why this should be necessary
in an aircraft equipped with on-board vibration monitoring and sensors
and the most up-to-date digital engine monitoring system in the
Air Force, Mr Rebbechi said.
DSTO, ALSPO and 37SQN conducted trials using ground-running equipment
that indicated the system could provide a much more efficient and
cost-effective solution than the current practice as the aircraft
monitoring system appeared to calculate all essential data needed
for a balance.
DSTO was invited to make a presentation on the trials to a meeting
of the JUG. Then Lockheed Martin invited the Australian team to
the US to meet with their senior propulsion engineers. The engineers
were unable to find valid reasons as to why the system should not
work and became keen to support the inclusion of in-flight propeller
balancing in future software upgrades.
The company agreed to support a proposal to progress trials to the
flight-testing stage. The US Air Force, US Coast Guard and US Marine
Corps were also enthusiastic about the proposal and, based on the
results so far, are considering abandoning plans to install and
additional on-board system.
Phase 1 flight tests were conducted under Air Lift Group direction
at Richmond last December. Propeller assemblies were intentionally
unbalanced to test and establish the balance factors.
The flight tests demonstrated the validity of using the engine
monitoring system. This success has demonstrated the Air Forces
ability to drive technical development of the aircraft, Mr
Rebbechi said.
|
|
|

.
|
|