|
RISKY
BUSINESS
Inappropriate sports listed
|
Athletes
frustated
|
By
CPL Alisha Carr
THE response to the ADF Sports Councils (ADFSC) release
of the Inappropriate Sports Listing has left some Defence
members angered and frustrated.
One association that will be adversely affected by the Inappropriate
Sports Listing is the Australian Army Alpine Skiing Association
and its President, Major Christopher Harrison, expressed his
concern.
I believe to call alpine skiing dangerous is a gross
exaggeration, he said.
I also predict that this year will be the last year
we are able to hold the ADF National Alpine Skiing Titles
because if COs are unable to release people to compete in
the event, we obviously cannot run the competition.
Flying Officer Matt Doyle, of DPO-AF, in a letter to Air Force
News, criticised the decision to classify some sports as inappropriate.
The failure of the ADF to promulgate a mature policy
on the matter leads me to think that the issues havent
really been considered, he said. What I want to
know is, is the ADF now going to ban all of the approved sporting
and recreational clubs that exist on every base in Australia
for activities such as abseiling, rock-climbing, scuba diving
and water skiing?
One certain outcome of reactionary policy making will
be the loss of more experienced and valuable personnel, jaded
and embittered at yet another erosion to their conditions
of service and another unnecessary restriction on their lives. |
By CPL
Alisha Carr
THE ADF Sports Council (ADFSC) has responded to concerns about the
Inappropriate Sports Listing, which restricts COs in their discretion
to authorise the on-duty participation of members in listed sports
and activities in off-duty hours.
Chairman of the ADF Sports Council Colonel Andrew Nikolic said the
Inappropriate Sports Listing was devised after a period of review
and consultation and highlighted an increasing trend of sports-related
injuries, rising compensation costs and negative capability impacts.
There was a clear need to have a fresh look at ADF sport and,
in particular, issues like workplace risk assessment, duty of care
and Commonwealth liability, he said.
The outcomes of this study were endorsed by senior Defence
leaders and reflected a desire to ensure that participation by ADF
members in sport and recreation activities was founded on an appropriate
balance of risk, cost and benefit.
He said the outcome of the review was a recommendation to publish
a list on the ADFSC web site detailing sports and activities that
were considered to be inappropriate for ADFSC, single-service
or CO authorisation.
The web site address is http://defweb.cbr.defence.gov.au/adfsc.
Choose the link list of inappropriate sports.
After having their memberships revoked by the ADFSC, the Army Alpine
Association, ADF Parachute Association, Services Sailing Association
(relating to offshore and ocean yachting), Services Water Skiing
Association and the Services Gliding Association, will no longer
be recognised by Defence.
The listing does not impact on the conduct of military training,
or on a members freedom to participate in any sport or activity
when not on duty, or on adventurous training activities that are
covered by a separate policy.
As has always been the case, members may engage in any sport
or activity during off-duty hours, but must recognise that if they
choose to do so without ADF authorisation, they personally accept
the risks involved.
The rationale that underpins this outcome is that while the
ADF may gain some benefit from a members participation in
certain sports or activities, in some cases the benefit is substantially
outweighed by potential risks.
COL Nikolic said given that these risks often occurred in an environment
where the ADF had no ability to influence conduct or safety, it
was appropriate to consider which risks the ADF was prepared to
underwrite.
The policy does not mean ADF members who are injured while
participating in the listed sports are not entitled to free medical
cover. It does, however, mean the ADF will not compensate for injuries
received while participating in the listed activities.
It is considered that the current range of sports and recreational
activities available to ADF members strikes a reasonable balance
between risk, cost and benefit.
It is noteworthy that the ADF appears to be the only employer
in Australia that continues to deem members on duty and provide
workers compensation cover to employees who are participating
in non-representative sporting activities after hours and outside
of work premises.
This is still the case for a large number of sports that COs
may grant duty status for. The policy changes described merely seek
to restrict this approval to sports that the ADF feels it gains
most benefit from.
While noting a small number of complaints, I believe current
sports policy is consistent with the needs of the majority of members
across all age groups.
|