|
HAVE
YOUR SAY
|
Readers
are invited to submit letters for publication on issues
relating to the Air Force or in response to items that
appear in Air Force News.
Official replies will be sought and included where appropriate.
Preference will be given to letters under 300 words.
Correspondents must include their name and address.
Send letters to: The Editor, Air Force News, R8-LG-042,
Russell Offices, Canberra, ACT, 2600; or raafnews@defencenews.gov.au
(please note this is not an internal e-mail address). |
|
Thanks
for the warm welcome
ON
behalf of the members of the 84WG Detachment, I would like to thank
all personnel who were involved in the development, organisation
and execution of the welcome home ceremony that was conducted on
Sunday, September 29.
Not only did the event receive exceptional praise from Commander
Air Lift Group and impressive accolades from the Prime Minister
and Chief of Defence Force, the event also received an astounding
level of media interest and news coverage.
Most importantly, the members of 84WG Detachment appreciated the
effort that was made to ensure that their return to Australia was
especially memorable. I believe that the families that attended
the event were also pleased with the respect that was shown to their
returning loved ones.
In particular I would like to thank the members of the Honour Guard.
All who were present agreed that the Honour Guard was extremely
professional in the execution of their duties, which proved to be
in the finest traditions of the Royal Australian Air Force.
- Group
Captain S. N. Bucholtz
OC 84WG
A
policemans lot
I read
(with a smile) the letter regarding the SECPOL musterings
new brassard (Air Force News, September 26). The answer to Adrian
Heinrichs questions is yes, the Air Force is a master of reinventing
the wheel.
In my 22 years with the mustering I was a Provost, SG (Doggie),
SP (SPIT or Screw), RAAFPOL (that ****), RAAFPOL2 (Townie), RAAFPOLIN
(that big **** Townie) and finally a SECPOL2.
I discharged before the troops found a new name for the last one.
One name stayed the same throughout my career, and it referred to
my parentage but only from those people that did the wrong
thing and got caught.
Uniforms were also interesting over the years. They consisted of
overalls, jungle greens, long and short drabs, old blues, new blues,
DCPUs and civvies.
Im glad I discharged before the old blues came back; at my
age I would have been totally confused. So its not only that
whats it called mustering that changes names,
the Air Force itself changes its spots on a regular basis to confuse
the troops and the nation.
However, Im sure that the name of the SP in future will be
SPIT or Screw or that ****.
- Jeff
Crase
Sergeant (retd)
Adelaide
Honour
them all
Recent letters in Air Force News and ex-Service publications have
raised a number of anomalies regarding the eligibility for the award
of the Anniversary of National Service Medal (ANSM).
In 2001 the Government announced that the ANSM was to be awarded
to those who were conscripted and fulfilled their obligation for
National Service.
However, what subsequently appeared in the regulations does not
fit some conscripts of the Vietnam War era despite a one size
fits all approach.
During the 1960s and 70s, 20-year-old Australian males were
drafted in to the military.
Options for National Service at that time were either to serve full-time
in the Army for two years, or to serve a combination of full-time
Army and part-time Citizens Military Forces. Alternatively, people
could join the permanent forces for a longer engagement to fulfil
their National Service obligation.
When conscripted, failure to avail oneself of this opportunity
to serve the nation invoked punitive powers under the National Service
Act. Alternative service as an inmate of Her Majestys
correctional establishments was a potential outcome for draft dodgers.
It would be equitable for all servicemen who served at that time
to be recognised also.
Surely the ANSM wasnt intended to imply that permanent service
with (or without) a National Service obligation of two years was
in some way inferior to short-term Army National Service.
There were some who received their call-up papers after joining
the regular forces, while others joined the regulars after their
call up. These servicemen had an obligation to serve, which they
fulfilled in the regular forces. They were indeed conscripted National
Servicemen by whatever name. They deserve equal recognition accordingly.
As the regulations stand, only National Service conscripts who served
in the Army receive the ANSM. The conscripts who served in the regular
forces receive no more tangible recognition than afforded to those
who didnt serve at all; indeed no formal distinction from
the draft evaders later excused by the Whitlam Governments
amnesty.
For military service during the Vietnam War era, the fundamental
consideration should have been recognition of service to the nation
during those difficult times, of which National Service was but
one part.
Those conscripts who fulfilled their National Service obligation
in any component of the forces should receive due recognition.
Additionally, those who had no formal National Service obligation
and yet served voluntarily in the permanent forces cant be
relegated to the dont matter category. A review
of the regulations is overdue.
- Warrant
Officer Paul Watson
Health Services Wing
RAAF Glenbrook
(ex-National Service conscript still serving)
In the picture
Air Commodore Norman Ashworth (retd) rightly points out in
his letter that Air Marshal Sir Richard Williams did not retire
as an Air Vice-Marshal (Air Force News, August 29).
He was referring to an article about the unveiling of an official
portrait of Sir Richard (Air Force News, August 15).
AIRCDRE Ashworth would not be aware that the artist was commissioned
to depict Sir Richard when he was Chief of Air Staff, with the rank
of Air Vice-Marshal, early in 1939. The portrait is now prominently
displayed in Williams Theatre at the Australian Command and Staff
College at Weston Creek, ACT.
At the unveiling Chief of Air Force Air Marshal Angus Houston stated
that the portrait will rightly become the recognised face of Sir
Richard Williams throughout the Air Force. To facilitate this outcome,
a digital image of the portrait has been posted on the image gallery
of the Air Force home page at www.raaf.gov.au. Click on Image Gallery
then search for Williams: Founding Father of the Air Force.
Incidentally, Wing Commander Williams was the Founding Father of
the (Australian) Air Force, gazetted on March 31, 1921. He became
the first Chief of the Royal Australian Air Force, when the fledgling
Service received Royal Assent on August 13, 1921.
- Peter
McDermott
Air Commodore
ACSC Commandant
Is
this a mirage?
On a recent trip to Butterworth I was appalled to discover that
the former 79SQN Mirage located outside the Airmans Mess (A3-59)
now has the 324CSS crest on the tail.
I cannot think of any justifiable reason for such an action
can someone please explain?
- Flight
Lieutenant Tim Flood
10SQN
RAAF Edinburgh
|