Masthead :: NAVY News :: The official newspaper of the Royal Australian Navy 

Contents
Top Stories
Letters
Features
Finance
Recreation
Entertainment
Health and Fitness
Sport
About us
Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Features - Seaworthy

Op STAYSAFE 22 – ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT

 

Ladder Falls

21 OHSIRS so far this calendar year have reported ladder falls, 20 of which resulted in injury and the 21st almost resulted in a formal charge of self-endangerment for the ‘movie stunt’ of sliding down the handrails.

So what’s going on out there in the Fleet? We’ve all been taught how to safely ascend/descend ladders and most of these incidents have been caused by the failure to maintain three points of contact. The large number of the injuries (not to mention the lost time and potential impact on operational capability) would be prevented if personnel were to slow down and transit ladders in the correct manner.

Sailors tend to go up’n’down ladders about 50 times a day and each safe journey adds to the complacency, especially when you become ‘salty’ enough to descend facing away from the ladder.

The safest method of transiting a ladder is to face the rungs/steps and maintain three points of contact with the ladder at all times. This method is mandatory for personnel wearing OCCABA. However, there is another old sailor’s rule that recognises that ships are unpredictable and unstable platforms; that rule is ‘One hand for yourself, one hand for the ship.’ This rule deals with practical ‘situation awareness’ onboard a ship and if ‘Murphy’s Law’ has taught you anything, probably the worse place for you to be when something goes wrong is on a ladder, unless you are prepared for something to go wrong at all times.

As an added hazard to moving about the ship, you yourself are not all that predictable. Fatigue, inattention, the afore-mentioned complacency and, believe it or not, fair wear and tear of your body all contribute to the potential of a ladder fall. You are even more unpredictable when you’re carrying something.

So take your time, get there safe and get a grip..

Volume 49, No. 12, July 13, 2006

All of you who are reading this article are important. Important to your families, your friends and to the rest of us in Navy. To this end, the safeguarding of our health is the primary focus of many agencies in Defence, and one of the main potential impactors on our health being addressed is asbestos. More specifically, the focus is on the identification, removal, sealing or encapsulating (to make safer) of any identified asbestos in our working environment. The identification and removal of asbestos has been a longstanding issue as asbestos has been classed as a hazard to our health. Yet, in years gone by it was seen as an indispensable product and incorporated into many of our goods for everyday usage. Asbestos has been used extensively in ADF platforms, equipment and in some facilities used by the ADF and the Department of Defence. Due to its inherent properties, asbestos was utilised in building materials, thermal and acoustic insulation gaskets, valve gaskets and bulk gasket materials, seals, brake pads, aircraft panels and as filler in adhesives. When asbestos was used for its resistance to fire or heat, the fibres were often mixed with cement or woven into fabric or mats.

The main problem with asbestos is that most breathable asbestos fibres are invisible to the human eye because their size is about 3.0-20.0 micrometres (m) in length and can be as thin as 0.01 m. Human hair ranges in size from 17 to 181 m. The fibres break down when sufficient force is applied to asbestos particles and this will continue to occur over and over until the fibres have been broken down to their smallest particle sizes. For this reason, one large asbestos fibre can ultimately become the source of thousands of much thinner and smaller fibres over the course of time.

In December 2003, a prohibition notice was placed on the importation and use of all types of asbestos but, due to the mission-critical nature of a number of platforms, Defence has been granted an exemption for the use of certain specified chrysotile (white) asbestos products, particularly encapsulated and ‘in-situ’ products. By encapsulating or not disturbing ‘in-situ’ asbestos (such as internal gaskets or panels) the risk of exposure and inhalation of free floating asbestos fibres is reduced to ‘as low as reasonably practicable’ (ALARP).

Most uses of asbestos are banned and fibreglass has been found to be a suitable substitute for thermal insulation, and woven ceramic fibre performs as well as or better than asbestos. Many seals or fittings are being, or have been, replaced with fibreglass or non-hazardous products.

If you suspect a material may contain asbestos, it should be reported to the Marine Engineering Officer (MEO) in HMA Ships and to CSIG in establishments (CSIG responsibilities are contained in Safety Manual Vol 1, Part 5, Chapter 2, Para 2.11). DI(N) PERS 32-1 then directs that the location and use of the suspect material is to be entered into the Asbestos Hazard Register (form AC585) and to treat the substance as hazardous until proven otherwise.

Appropriate PPE is to be worn if the area must be accessed. All material listed in the register is to be visually inspected for any potential asbestos fibre risk at six-monthly intervals by a member of Ship’s Staff who has completed the Ship’s Lagger Applied Skill Technology Course (Proficiency P000330) or an equivalent course. A record of each inspection is to be entered, certified, signed and dated in the Asbestos Hazard Register. Remember, the only personnel trained to remove or handle asbestos are qualified contractors or personnel who have completed the Ship’s Lagger course or equivalent.

It’s not all ‘doom and gloom’, DMO Maritime System division is currently investigating and purging the inventory of any identifiable asbestos to reduce exposure to ALARP.

Having said that, remember that there are no safe limits of exposure to asbestos. SAFETYMAN Vol 1, Part 5, Chapter 2.8 states that ‘… a worker should never be exposed to more than 0.1 fibres per millilitre of air over an eight hour day/five day week.’ Therefore, as you are moving around your work environment, and if you see an asbestos tag, be mindful of the health aspects attached to asbestos exposure and take all reasonable care to safeguard your own health and the health of others.

If you think that you may have been exposed to asbestos, you can contact the Defence Asbestos Exposure Evaluation Scheme (DAEES).

The DAEES is open to current and former civilians of the Department of Defence and former ADF members. The scheme enables a free service to those eligible to participate, as it is sponsored by the Defence Centre for Occupational Health. The service includes assessment, counselling and any further necessary testing. If you suspect that you have been exposed to asbestos while working for Defence, call the asbestos helpline on 1800 000 655. Currently, serving ADF members must contact their local ADF Health Service to arrange an asbestos exposure evaluation.

Further information on asbestos can be found at:

KEEP NAVY SAFE

Dangerous ‘Extreme Sport’ Injury

No sooner had last month’s SEAWORTHY hit the streets when an OHSIR was received underlining the need to be aware of your surroundings and conditions when participating in sport. Any sport.

A member was playing lawn bowls with his ship’s CO when, whilst transiting from one end of the green to the other, he fell over. The Member was treated by the ship’s medical staff at the scene for a sprained ankle and was eventually declared TMU for seven days and flown back to his home port with an op-relief arranged. The contributing factor to this injury included the weather conditions of a recent scattered shower that caused the green to become slippery and demonstrates the necessity of being ‘Safety Aware’ at even a gentle sporting event.

Please note that neither foul play nor the score was a consideration in this unfortunate incident.

 

Alert Contractor

The quick actions of a contractor prevented a minor wharf spill of a fuel/water mixture from becoming a major incident.

A submarine was discharging compensate water via the fitted sullage system to a road tanker when the tanker operator noticed an overflow from one of the vehicle’s six tanks. The flow of compensate water was immediately ceased and the spill (of approximately 30 litres) was cleaned up by the contractor and the submarine’s crew. The prompt action taken by the contractor and the assistance of the crew ensured that the effects of the spill were kept to a minimum.

Although the existing SOPs require the road tanker operator to remain at the vehicle controls throughout the evolution to monitor equipment performance, this occurrence emphasises that the ongoing monitoring of these types of activities is essential if spills are to be effectively controlled.

 

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top Stories | Letters | Features | Finance | Computing | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us