Masthead :: NAVY News :: The official newspaper of the Royal Australian Navy  

Contents
Top Stories
Letters
Features
Finance
Recreation
Entertainment
Health and Fitness
Sport
About us
Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Features - History

Senior service right royal explanation

By LEUT Tom Lewis

A sure way of ensuring rage from Army colleagues is for a Navy member to start up a discussion as to the order of protocol for a march, or a display, or whatever - and insisting that Navy goes first, in that “the Navy is the Senior Service”.

But what is the background, and indeed the validity of this argument? The usual suggestion is that the Royal Navy is the oldest service in Britain’s history. There was a “standing Navy” in Tudor times, whereas the Army was an occasional thing, dating back from the “feudal levies”.

Indeed, if we examine the history of the British Navy, we can see that many historians trace it back to King Alfred’s time, when in 885AD he “...went out to sea in ships and fought against four ships’ companies of Danes.” A rationale for keeping naval forces on hand relates to the way armies and navies were used from their earliest times.

An army’s main tactics related to skills that could be kept up without the soldiers being in a permanent force: the use of bow and simple sword was a skill that an average rural inhabitant of Britain might be expected to keep for defence and for hunting. Thus the main body of troops did not need to be professional soldiers.

However, the handling of a ship at sea demanded more practice, and ships needed to be maintained and kept ready for use. Therefore, for example, the British in 1217 were able to put immediately to sea a force of 36 ships to deal with a French fleet threatening attack off Dover.

And so down the years the monarchs saw to it that a full-time force was maintained. A permanent army, by contrast, does not seem to be a feature of British history until the “New Model” force under Cromwell.

Indeed, as one Encyclopedia notes, there is indeed some seniority involved in the prefix “Royal” for the Navy: “The incorporation of the Royal Navy was in contrast to the land forces, which are descended from parliamentary forces and hence are not royal”. The bequeathing of traditions, customs, and ship battle honours from the RN to its daughter-service of the RAN means that the RAN has inherited the term “senior service” as well.

Indeed, the term is still in popular use, as the Australian Defence Force saw recently: “Defence Minister Robert Hill will congratulate the incoming Chief of Navy and says he looks forward to working closely with the new head of the ADF’s senior service.”

 

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top Stories | Letters | Features | Finance | Computing | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us