|
|
Letters
Super
story sparks concern
I refer to an article “No change with super choice” (Navy News,
July 14).
It was sourced from the Defence Personnel Executive and provided
by the Director of Pay and Conditions. I don’t like the thrust
of the article, but am particularly concerned with the statement
that the DFRDB was “carefully designed to meet the special needs
of ADF members”.
It wasn’t designed at all; it is the outcome of the fiery negotiations,
between my predecessors in the Regular Defence Force Welfare Association
(RDFWA), the Department of Defence and a parliamentary Sub Committee,
which were initiated because pre-emptive changes contemplated
to the superannuation of ADF personnel were extraordinarily disadvantageous
and plainly wrong!
We won that fight to the degree that the Parliamentary Sub - Committee
recommended that the RDFWA continue as a voice of service and
ex-service personnel, in welfare matters; the Chiefs of the Services
and relevant Ministers agreed.
In other words, our efforts to adjust the DFRDB to actually “meet
the special needs of ADF members” resulted in official acknowledgement
that there should be customer input into the welfare debate –
at the time it was a unique achievement.
The RDFWA continues today to overview Defence Conditions of Service
and we have a plethora of unresolved issues, some major-some minor,
which we believe disadvantage service personnel.
Anyone interested should go to www.rdfwa.org.au
Terry Jones
Vice President,
RDFWA
|
How
to contact us
|
|
Navy
News would like to encourage its readers to write in and
express their views.
Preference will be given to typed letters or e-mails of
up to 250 words. Letters will only be published when they
include the author’s name, ship or unit (where applicable),
location and contact number. Note that the authors details
can be witheld from print if requested.
Send letters to: The Editor, Navy News, R8-LG-039, Russell
Offices, Dept of Defence, Canberra, ACT 2600. Phone (02)
6266 7707, fax (02) 6265 6690 or e-mail: navynews@defencenews.gov.au
(please note that this is not an internal e-mail address
and therefore requires Sec: Unclassified in the subject
line when sending from a DRN terminal.
|
|
|
|

.
|
|