|
|
Letters
Submariner
role equal to others
I
commend the author of the article in Navy News (March 11) addressing
the issue of loss of allowances by members of the submarine fraternity.
I also acknowledge the hard yards put in by the patrol
boat group over the years. Notwithstanding, no one section of
this Navy contributes any more or any less to the ultimate goal,
which is to fight and win at sea.
Likewise, our brothers and sisters in Establishments do their
bit, without which our seagoing colleagues could not perform their
roles and receive their richly deserved accolades.
As HMAS Bendigos charge says, nothing is free.
I have personal family connections with the submarine service
and I have the greatest admiration for those who go down to, and
under, the sea in boats.
That does not mean they are any more special than the crew of
a frigate loitering off Christmas Island for months at a time,
a Fleet Unit on patrol in the Gulf, or a patrol boat/survey vessel
spending mind-numbing weeks on station. They each have a role.
Our fathers and grandfathers would turn in their graves
if they could hear us complaining about allowances and the conditions
we endure. My late father endured the siege of Tobruk, living
in a sand pit, consuming stew garnished with flies and got wounded
several times for his troubles.
A grandfather endured the mud and filth of Gallipoli and the Somme,
losing his life at Menin Wood. My cousin, a US Marine, lost his
life in Vietnam on his second tour of duty. Lets not talk
about conditions. Weve got it good! The next
thing you know we will be asking for time off for marching on
Anzac Day!
Without wishing to labour the point too much, I can personally
relate to sleeping in hammocks slung over the top of a screaming
fire and bilge pump under asbestos-riddled insulation, deploying
up top without the benefits of air conditioning, showering
in salt water, sleeping on the upper deck when conditions below
were unbearable and working in machinery spaces in temperatures
upwards of 110 degrees Fahrenheit.
Out of all this I have contracted certain medical disabilities,
including hearing loss and asbestosis. But I had a damn good time
throughout all these trials and tribulations and I always knew
what the word shipmate meant.
If you joined the Service, or a branch of the Service, solely
for the money, then you shouldnt be here. Submariners are
a specialist group, as are Clearance Divers and Aviators, but
that doesnt mean they are precious or special.
Show me the Diver who joined his Category just for the money -
you wont, because its a job satisfaction thing. Show
me the SAS Troopers who did selection for extra money. Again,
you wont find them. They are dedicated. The same, Im
sure, goes for the majority of submariners.
I know times have changed and we need to live in the present,
but for Gods sake, lets grow up, harden up and get
on with the job!
As an old sailor once said, Its life in a blue suit.
As a former, late, US President once said, Ask not what
your country can do for you.
CPONPC Stevan Coll
Fleet Base West WA
Navy News thanks its readers for participating in this debate.
All letters on subsistance will be forwarded to the appropriate
area for consideration
Praise
for our Navy good samaritans
I
was in Queanbeyan last Saturday morning, sitting, waiting at the
lights, when an elderly man in a wheelchair was trying to get
across in time before the lights changed.
There were two ladies in a car waiting
for
the right hand green arrow, who noticed this gentlemans
plight immediately. One young lady hopped out of the car and helped
this gentleman get to the other side of the street safely.
Who were they?
The lady who assisted was a Navy officer in her white uniform
(I think she was an officer) the driver was also a Navy person
in blue. It was very uplifting to see these two young ladies assisting
and showing the flag of humanity and the Navy.
Could you pass this on, as like all of us the public and media
is quick to criticise but slow to praise.
Denise Hipwell
Queanbeyan NSW
Waiting
for recognition
I
have just sat through yet another news program covering the award
of the Service medals, this time by the Minister of Defence to
those who served in the Solomons.
Having returned from six months duty in Iraq at the beginning
of February, I am curious when I, and other servicemen and women
who served in this area of operations can expect to be honoured
in the same way.
While there is no doubt that we are entitled to the AASM, there
appears to be an arguement among the bureacrats in Canberra as
to which clasp will accompany the medal - Iraq or the International
Coalition Against Terrorism (ICAT).
Along with the changes that now require us to go cap in hand to
the Directorate of Honours and Awards to be recognised for long
service and other decorations, I find this situation yet another
example of the hipocracy practised by our masters in Canberra
who continue to try an convince us that we are Defences
most important asset. How much longer can we be expected to wait
for what is rightfully ours?
LCDR M. Aichholzer
HMAS Kuttabul NSW
Consider
yard space
I
understand that the Defence Housing Authority is doing the best
they can for members with limited resources and in the main they
are doing a good job. However a recent article in my local newspaper
has concerned me enough to bring the issue to a wider audience.
In the Hornsby Shire, DHA have had a development approval knocked
back due to wanting to place five townhouses on a block that currently
has three houses.
According to the development application each townhouse would
be on a block smaller than the council guidelines of 500m/sq.
If this is correct then none of these proposed townhouses would
have any kind of usable outdoor area. Given the poor outdoor amenities
of many of the Sydney DHA properties I looked at when I was house
hunting in Dec 2003 and Jan 2004, this does not surprise me much.
The majority of defence personnel are in the age groups that have
or are intending to have children and the lack of outdoor play
areas is a major concern of these families. DHA need to start
thinking just as much about outdoor amenities as whether or not
properties have the appropriate floor plan.
Cheryl van Tienhoven
Epping NSW
|
How
to contact us
|
|
Navy
News would like to encourage its readers to write in and
express their views.
Preference will be given to typed letters or e-mails of
up to 250 words. Letters will only be published when they
include the author’s name, ship or unit (where applicable),
location and contact number. Note that the authors details
can be witheld from print if requested.
Send letters to: The Editor, Navy News, R8-LG-039, Russell
Offices, Dept of Defence, Canberra, ACT 2600. Phone (02)
6266 7707, fax (02) 6265 6690 or e-mail: navynews@defencenews.gov.au
(please note that this is not an internal e-mail address
and therefore requires Sec: Unclassified in the subject
line when sending from a DRN terminal.
|
|
|
|

.
|
|