left margin of masthead Masthead :: NAVY News :: The official newspaper of the Royal Australian Navy NAVY Badge

Contents
Top Stories
Letters
Features
Finance
Recreation
Entertainment
Health and Fitness
Sport
About us
Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Top Stories

Capability part of the territory

By Louise Butcher

Achieving the Navy’s objectives under the Defence Capability Review (DCR) is something that CN VADM Ritchie regards as his “own personal territory”.

Speaking at the Defence Watch Seminar at the National Press Club, VADM Ritchie said that the DCR had forced Navy to make some hard decisions and that the implications arising out of these decisions were significant.

VADM Ritchie said that despite other areas of Defence being involved in the fruition of the DCR objectives, he has a strong attachment to seeing the objectives through whilst he fills the role of CN.

“Achieving the Defence Capability Review from a Navy point of view is for me probably the most critical matter confronting the RAN at the moment and clearly something that I regard as my own personal territory,” VADM Ritchie said.

“For the great majority of my 40 years of service the Navy has been a peacetime Navy.

When I joined in the mid-60s we went through six or seven years with a particular part of Navy serving in Vietnam but then [afterwards], we really didn’t do too many things that were operational.

VADM Ritchie said that the Navy’s experiences and the increase in operational tempo in recent years had led to growth in the Navy’s three core roles: war fighting, constabulary duties and diplomacy.

“Navy’s capability is indeed focused more towards the offshore, surveillance, patrol and interdiction tasks that are an everyday part of our constabulary role,” he said “There is also a recognition that security on the high seas will become an issue.

The continuing threats of WMD and missile proliferation also have a destabilising influence in many areas of the world.”

The proposals in the DCR will provide an enduring framework for equipping Navy with the most appropriate and effective capabilities for the future, no matter what strategic issues arise.

“The DCR did highlight two discernible deficiencies in the Navy’s and indeed the ADF’s force structure – these being the lack of a robust amphibious force which can lift, lodge, sustain, withdraw and protect an Army force, and the lack of maritime air defence,” VADM Ritchie said.

The biggest acquisition for Navy based on the proposals in the DCR is the two helicoptercapable amphibious ships of over 20,000 tonnes, replacing HMAS Tobruk and one of the LPAs.

Other major force structure changes contained in the DCR include the acquisition of three new Air Warfare Destroyers, the upgrade of four FFGs with SM-2 and the retirement of the two oldest FFGs after the last ANZAC Class Frigate comes on line.

In addition, two coastal minehunters will be laid up and HMAS Westralia replaced.

 

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top Stories | Letters | Features | Finance | Computing | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us