Just
and fair system for all
In
this edited version of the Minister for Defences statement
to Senate Additional Estimates on February 18, 2004, Senator
Hill addresses the issues of gang rape, suicide and military
justice.
 |
|
Keeping
an eye out for all ADF members Senator Hill
onboard HMAS Melbourne.
|
Ive
said before that the military justice system must be rigorous,
fair and accountable to the public - and that the Senate inquiry
is part of that public accountability.
The Parliament has the right to assess whether the rules that
relate to personal behaviour within the military and their application
accord to contemporary expectations.
However, I am deeply concerned about the path the Committee
appears to be taking.
Last week, the Committee decided to publish 15 of the submissions
it had received - most focussing on the experiences of individual
families.
Whilst this is not an uncommon practice, this is an inquiry
unlike most others undertaken by the Parliament.
The issues are highly emotive and extremely personal. Some of
the accusations levelled at individuals and institutions are
of the worst kind - rape, bullying, neglect, incompetence.
Those
that are based on substance and supported by evidence should
certainly be treated with the utmost seriousness, rigorously
tested by the Committee and the right lessons should be drawn
from them. But releasing submissions without testing the veracity
of the information fails to recognise the impact they will have
on the men and women of the ADF.
The Committee agreed to publish a submission which claims that
there have been anywhere between 10 and 100 victims of gang
rape at ADFA and that the perpetrators of these crimes are still
within the ranks of the ADF. The claim was completely unsubstantiated.
Even the author of the submission acknowledges his estimate
is based solely on rumours he had heard almost 20 years ago.
This would not be accepted in any court in this land. Yet in
posting it on the website with the protection of Parliamentary
privilege, the Committee has given these claims and others in
the same submission wide public exposure and an unjustified
degree of implied credibility. The media went into a feeding
frenzy.
In fact, there have been no reported allegations I am advised
of gang rapes in the 18 years of its existence. And rape of
course is not an issue of military justice. Rape prosecutions
occur in civil courts. Rapists are prosecuted by civil police
and presented before civil judges. The result has been a slur
against all the men and women in the ADF whose integrity has
now been put in question on the basis of rumour and untested
speculation.
A number of the released submissions are from family members
still struggling to cope with the tragic loss of a loved one
through suicide. Their emotions are still raw and their grief
understandable. This Committee needs to be mindful of the extraordinarily
sensitive environment in which its operating.
The very tragic issue of a small number of suicides in the ADF
should not cast a long shadow over all who serve.
Any suicide is a tragedy, and the families of ADF members who
suicide should certainly be given prompt and honest answers
to the questions they will inevitably ask.
Where failures in the military justice system have contributed
to a suicide those who have failed should be brought to account.
Where its evident that the system can be improved it should
be, but we should also put the issue in context.
The bigger picture is that military service and training is
by its very nature physically and mentally demanding. Personnel
need to be trained for the prospect of war fighting and how
to protect themselves in the most extreme circumstances. This
is not a benign environment. Its stressful. And of course
this very often is taking place a long way from home.
The ADF leadership acknowledges the challenges it poses for
young people. The ADF has moved with the times, changing its
training practices and built up its support mechanisms.
Again however, the context is important. It must be acknowledged
that the suicide of young people is not a problem that is unique
to the ADF - its a considerable problem in the wider Australian
community.
The issue as it affects the ADF should be seen, and in part
measured, in that context.
Individuals and families have the right to air their stories
and to have the military justice system scrutinised to ensure
that it is fair and just. The ADF should not be immune from
criticism, but such shortcomings should follow thorough and
objective process.
I want to underline the paramount importance of fair and just
treatment for all involved in the inquiry, for those who give
evidence, for the ADF members who try to ensure the equitable
and effective dispensation of military justice, and for all
the other men and women of the ADF who do not deserve to be
maligned by unsubstantiated claims such as those made about
ADFA.