. Logo of the Australian Department of Defence MinisterspacerNavyspacerArmyspacerAir ForcespacerDepartment
left margin of masthead Masthead :: NAVY News :: The official newspaper of the Royal Australian Navy NAVY Badge

Contents
Top Stories
Letters
Features
Finance
Recreation
Entertainment
Health and Fitness
Sport
About us
Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Top Stories

Pay arrangements under scrutiny
Federation back with first instalment in monthly column for Navy News


Cadets from TS Manoora looked impressive recently during a tri-Service parade in Taree, NSW.
Cadets from TS Manoora looked impressive recently during a tri-Service parade in Taree, NSW.

NO, the Armed Forces Federation did not die and go to heaven.

We are alive and still kicking, but we were missing in action for a while and are pleased the Service newspapers have decided to resurrect our column so we can resume the provision of independent and unfiltered views on ADF conditions of service.

And, with the replacement pay arrangements on the horizon, it could not have come at a better time.

The dust is yet to settle since release of the consultation draft of the proposed ADF Workplace Remuneration Arrangement (WRA) 2004-2006 and ADF road shows are still being conducted to spread the word about the new deal and gauge members’ views.

That brings us to the first point: that is, the continued denial for ADF personnel covered by the Arrangement to have the right to vote and insisting the chain of command be used as the primary mechanism to provide feedback to management before presenting this matter to the Defence Force Remuneration Tribunal (DFRT) for endorsement.

Feedback and acceptance by members is fundamental to any remuneration process but what has always concerned the Federation is the degree of uncertainty surrounding such acceptance and whether the chain of command is an appropriate mechanism to measure this. We say it is not.

There is only one way to be certain that the majority of ADF personnel accept what is put to them and that is by allowing them to vote on the WRA.

We understand there will be some strong opposition against voting with a preference to continue with the status quo. There also seems to be an unrealistic perception that a “no” vote (if that was to occur) would undermine command relationships.

Unit commanders and the majority of ADF personnel with rank on their arms and shoulders do not put the WRA together in the first place.

So, how and why would a vote of “no” undermine command?

If it was good enough for the star ranks to vote on their pay arrangement last year, why can’t the same courtesy be extended to the rank and file?

The Federation put the forgoing to the CDF when we last met with him on September 24 and while we respected each others views, we agreed to disagree on this aspect of the WRA process.

We will have a bit more to say on the proposed Arrangement after further assessment of its content and having considered the views of our membership.

The Armed Forces Federation of Australia can be contacted on (02) 6260 5100, 1800 806861 or Arffa@bigpond.com.

 

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top Stories | Letters | Features | Finance | Computing | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us