|
Historical Highlights - a series by LEUT Tom Lewis
Of men and mutinies
October 15, 2001
Mutiny is
perhaps the most emotive word in any Navy's language. It refers to both
individual and group refusal to obey orders, and is usually associated with
bloody uprisings on the part of the mutineers.
However, the great mutiny in
the Royal Navy at Spithead in 1797 was a quiet, orderly affair where discontented
crews sought a much-deserved improvement in their living conditions.
There was much agreement in
the Navy and beyond that the sailors' complaints were justified, and their
demands were met, and the ringleaders were not punished.
Other mutinies in the Royal
Navy included the Invergordon Mutiny of 1931, where crews rebelled against
a pay cut that had been ordered; again the discontent was seen as justified.
In the famous revolt against
LEUT William's Bligh's command of the Bounty in 1789, the crew mutinied
- after cohabiting with Tahiti women for five months - when Bligh took
her to sea to fulfil his orders to transport breadfruit seeds to the West
Indies.
Led by Fletcher Christian,
the mutineers set Bligh and his supporters adrift in the ship's longboat.
Sixteen of those remaining
on Bounty returned to Tahiti, but nine others settled on Pitcairn Island,
burning the Bounty to the waterline.
Bligh seems to have got bad
press over the years and those who remained loyal to him and subsequently
undertook the epic voyage from the Pacific through to Timor attested to
his firm but fair rule.
The RN pursued the mutineers
for several years after Bligh's return to England, and consequently captured
and hanged several, although those who escaped colonised Pitcairn Island.
Bligh was faced with more insurrection
in his career - the Rum Rebellion of 1808 when he was governor of NSW.
A famous mutiny in the Russian
Navy - later immortalised in the film Battleship Potemkin (1925) began
in 1905 when rotten meat was taken on board the Potemkin and the sailors
refused to eat the soup which was subsequently made from it.
A struggle on the quarterdeck
occurred when the men gathered there, and a sailor was killed in the struggle
with the ship's officers. This incident stirred up unrest in the city
of Odessa, where the ship was alongside, and this was violently suppressed
by the local military.
The Potemkin fired shots against
the shore in support of the local rebels and the rest of the Russian fleet
was brought in to subdue the ship, but no return shots were fired. One
other ship joined the Potemkin in mutiny, but later ran aground. The Potemkin
soon left Odessa and the sailors eventually sought asylum in Romania.
In the RAN we have been comparatively
free of such major disturbances. However, one mutiny occurred in Australian
waters before the birth of our Navy in 1911.
This incident concerned HMA
ships Firefly and Victoria, which left Melbourne in 1861 on a voyage to
northern Australia.
The ships were parted in a
cyclone near the Great Barrier Reef and Firefly ran aground on a reef.
Her consort found her two days later with all of the crew completely drunk
on rum taken from the cargo. The mutiny was put down and the ship repaired
and refloated.
The RAN's best-known mutiny
occurred in mid-1919, when, after some years away, HMAS Australia was
on her way back to the crew's homeland. She came alongside in Fremantle
and was due to sail again on Sunday, June 1.
Some hours before her departure
a large group of sailors assembled on the quarterdeck and appointed spokesmen
to voice concerns to the ship's captain. These were basically a request
for the ship to delay her sailing time to allow further shore leave for
the crew to meet friends and family.
Captain Cumberlege refused,
and as a result some sailors took action which prevented the ship from
leaving on time.
Almost a month later, five
sailors faced a court martial in Sydney over the incident. They were all
found guilty of mutiny and sentenced to prison sentences, the maximum
of which was two years.
A public outcry ensued. Supporters
of the sailors argued that Australians were not amenable to this type
of discipline and the sentences were 'savage'.
The court failed to comprehend
the conditions the sailors had been putting up with in war - and all of
this resulted in the sentences being commuted.
The two most senior members
of the Navy - RADM Grant, and CDRE Dumaresq - immediately tendered their
resignations in protest.
These however were subsequently
withdrawn when both were pressured to do so, and there the matter ended.
|