Shot at core initiative
Ex-members may get medallion
Point of recognition

Shot at core initiative

AT the risk of descending into diatribe, I would like to express my amazed disgust at the latest waste of time and money – the “I’m an Australian Soldier” medallion.

Nine core behaviours sounds more like a mass movement a la the Cultural Revolution than a code that diggers can relate to.

I do not know how much this farce costs, but I will guarantee it’s a lot more than it would cost to get every digger in the Army to a real rifle range at least once a year to fire at least 23 real bullets at real targets.

I have not fired a live round since 2002, hence my agitation.

Am I missing something here, or does Core Behaviour 1 expect non-arms corps soldiers to be “expert in close combat”, equipped only with token twice-yearly visits to the WTSS?

With regard to the other eight core behaviours, if I ever need a reminder in the form of a medallion gathering dust on the mantelpiece, then it’ll be time to hand in my DPCUs and join the public service.

If it’s not too late, please stop this silly joke, and send us all out to the rifle range.
Cpl Jason Gardner
BHQ 5CSSB
Banksmeadow

Lt-Col Richard King, SO1 Modernisation Coordination, FLW-A, responds:
THE first point to note is that the CA stated that the nine core behaviours are aspirational in nature and that we are not expected to be perfect in every behaviour.

The purpose of having nine core behaviours is to allow us to measure our performance against behaviours that will help us to deal with the challenges we are likely to face on operations. Improving our performance in the nine core behaviours will help us to succeed on operations now and into the future.

Second, the RSM-A noted that this initiative is an opportunity for people to provide ideas and contribute to their own development. You have certainly provided an idea, namely buying less medallions and more ammunition. Your idea, however, misses the target (no pun intended).

The Army does not have a current shortage of ammunition, and the “I’m an Australian Soldier” medallions are not being procured at the expense of ammunition. The medallions are only one part of the broader awareness campaign for the nine core behaviours, and they are intended to remind us of the duty we all share to serve the Army and maintain the traditions we hold in trust for the Australian nation.

Core Behaviour 1 does require all soldiers to be “an expert in close combat”. This does not mean that every soldier needs to be “expert” to the same level. The word expert means “a person who has special skill or knowledge in some particular field” (Macquarie Dictionary).

It is expected that all soldiers will have special skill or knowledge about close combat, but an infantry soldier will develop a higher level of skill than a logistician. What we need to be careful to do is to ensure that the logistician has enough expertise in close combat to be tactically proficient in the situations he or she is likely to face.

All of the core behaviours are important, and we cannot afford to neglect any of them. As stated by the CA and RSM-A, the responsibility for developing the nine core behaviours is one we all share and requires cooperation across Army. We will benefit from everybody thinking about the behaviours and sharing ideas on how to develop them.

Ex-members may get medallion

THE initiative of presenting the “I’m an Australian Soldier” medallion to each and every soldier is a great one and something the men and women can look back on years later when recalling their service.

Maybe CA Lt-Gen Leahy could explore the option of extending the initiative by allowing ex-Army persons to purchase a medallion at cost price using their ex-service number as a control measure?

When one has served a number of years in the Army, you still feel as part of a large extended family and I know for one I follow the news, especially the overseas news closely.

To all those who write – or are thinking of writing – to the letters page, keep it up. I believe everyone needs space to complain and criticise and the letters page allow people to get things – right or wrong – off their chest and also allows leaders to see what is being thought in the ranks.
Bob Sheppard
Ex-RAAC and RAInf
Joondalup, Perth


Lt-Col Richard King, SO1 Modernisation Coordination, FLW-A, responds:
WE are currently investigating the feasibility of making the medallions available to former Army members and the families of members.
There are a number of issues to be worked through, such as pricing, where to hold the medallions, how to advertise them and who to make them available to.
Once we work through these issues we’ll let everybody know what’s happening.

Point of recognition

IN reference to Lt-Col Franklin’s comments (Army, May 17) in response to my letter of April 19, I did overlook the commendation for members of DFSWT and I have sent him an email to clear up any issue.

I do, however, need to make it clear to Army readers that at no time was I pointing the finger at the School of Inf. I was making general observations because, after 17 years in the Army, I’m not seeing the runs on the board.

The CO of the School of Inf has led the way and shown it’s not too hard to do but I now dare others to follow.

The stats of the School of Inf speak for themselves and if more COs were this proactive, I would not have to make comments which could land me in hot water for speaking out. I do this for all those exceptional soldiers and officers in all commands, ARA and ARes who deserve recognition.
Cpl David Joliffe
3RAR
Holsworthy