|
|
News
Our
kits world class
 |
|
Kit
inspection: Prime Minister John Howard tests the weight
of a plate of the Armys new lightweight enhanced combat
body armour, as soldiers show him their new webbing and
personal field equipment. Photo by Phil Barling
|
AUSTRALIAN
soldiers deployed on combat operations overseas have some of the
best gear available in the world, according to CA Lt-Gen Peter
Leahy.
Lt-Gen Leahy moved to reassure troops and their families about
the soundness of the Armys combat clothing and equipment
after media reports about sub-standard kit.
Brig David Welch, Director-General Land Combat Systems in DMO,
echoed those sentiments, saying DMO is confident that the
combat equipment and clothing used by Army is safe and of high
quality.
Lt-Gen Leahy said the feedback he and CDF Air Chief Marshal Angus
Houston received from deployed troops was almost overwhelmingly
that the equipment
from our vehicles, our weapons, our
night-fighting equipment down to our clothing and body armour
is way ahead of anything else in the theatre, including those
of our major allies.
Id really like to reassure all Australians, particularly
the families and the mums and dads, that the equipment were
issuing to our soldiers to deploy forward on combat operations
is among the best in the world. Were not going to ask soldiers
to go into these very difficult and demanding conditions without
making sure that theyre as well equipped, as well trained,
as well prepared and as well led as we can make them. We want
them to come home; were going to look after them,
he said.
Im not going to say that everythings perfect.
Because of changes in technology, because of an adaptive enemy,
weve got to keep working at it, so we will change the equipment
fairly rapidly at times in our effort to try to
make sure weve got the best stuff.
Both Lt-Gen Leahy and Brig Welch stressed that the RODUM system
helped ensure the ongoing safety and quality of combat equipment
and clothing.
RODUMs provide information that allows DMO to identify and
respond to safety issues, and to identify possible improvements
for future versions of equipment, Brig Welch said. The
most common type of RODUM on clothing and field equipment reports
a manufacturing fault that is identified when an item is issued
or first put into use. In the case of the Terra Combat Boot, close
to 50 per cent of RODUMs report manufacturing faults such as missing
eyelets and lumps of adhesive inside the boot.
He noted that the number of RODUMs received across the range of
combat clothing and field equipment is small compared to
the numbers of each item on issue and in use.
While RODUMs identified individual problems, that did not mean
the items were unsuitable for their intended purpose. Brig Welch
said many RODUMs occurred because equipment was incorrectly fitted
or used.
Examples of this are blisters caused by an incorrectly fitted
boot the problem in this case is the fitting process, not
the boot, he said.
To remedy this issue, a program of training for Q store staff
will begin in July to ensure all personnel are fitted with correct
boots. A new version of the combat boot version 5
will be introduced later this year.
Brig Welch pointed out that the fleece combat jacket which
media reports stated was flawed because it showed up under night-vision
equipment was not intended to be an outer garment
when in a combat environment. He said a new
version of the combat jacket currently under development would
include the near infra-red technology developed by DSTO.
In response to media reports that the jackets cuffs were
highly flammable, Brig Welch said they would be tested for
flammability to resolve uncertainty about flammability characteristics.
He said new clothing and equipment underwent extensive assessment
before it was issued throughout Army.
Testing can involve agencies such as DSTO, Land Engineering
Agency, the Australian Wool Testing Authority and CSIRO. Trialling
often involves Army units where a unit is tasked to use one or
more developmental systems and provide feedback. This approach
has been used with the load carriage equipment being provided
by Land 125, Soldier Combat System, enhanced combat helmets and
enhanced combat body armour, he said.
RODUMs: How Defence responds
-
Immediately
on receipt, RODUMs are categorised by the relevant SPO Chief
Engineer as being primarily related to safety, maintaining current
capability, reducing life cycle costs or enhancing capability.
-
RODUMs
relating to safety initiate a quick investigation to identify
the ramifications for the reported equipment and similar equipment
throughout the ADF. The submitting unit will receive a response
within 24 hours; this may advise immediate mitigation measures.
-
RODUMs
which relate to maintaining current capability and reducing
life cycle costs are examined within the SPO to determine what
action is appropriate.
-
RODUMs
which relate to enhancements to capability are referred to AHQ
for evaluation. Many of the RODUMs on clothing and personal
equipment fit into this category. The reports are considered
by the Army Clothing and Personal Equipment Committee, and often
contribute to the design and development of the next generation
of equipment.
|
| |
|
|

.
|
|