Army :: The Soldier's Newspaper

Contents
Top Stories
Letters
Features

Computing
Entertainment
Health and Fitness
Only Joking

Sport
About us
Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Letters to the Editor

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quicklinks to Letters

Give credit where it's due
Unfair criticism
Hat stand

PNG thanks

How to write to Army News

Give credit where it's due

AS A soldier of 30 years' experience I have witnessed a lot of changes in the Army.

Many have been for the general good of all, but one attitudinal change I see now is troubling: the number of soldiers who, when another soldier receives a medal or award, comments that it's "another 'gong' for just doing his job".

As a technical person this grates as a failure of logic, and as an alumnus of the profession of arms it saddens me that other soldiers do not instinctively pay the recipient the credit due for a job well done.

As for logic, the Infantry Combat Badge can only be awarded to infanteers who do their job in a combat situation.

The Nursing Cross can only be awarded to nurses for doing their job.

The Victoria Cross can only be awarded for doing the job of a soldier in the face of an enemy; no amount of bravery in other situations will see it awarded. Members who were awarded the 10FSB Meritorious Unit Citation are sometimes belittled by "you got that for driving trucks, issuing stores and stuff".

Sure, this is not a bravery award but neither is an Order of Australia Medal. Many awards recognise service under arduous conditions or in exceptional circumstances where a member or group has excelled.

Everyone should bear in mind when Australia Day or Queen's Birthday honours are published that nobody gets an award just for "services to Training Command", for example.

Each of the awa r d s announced will come with a long citation which details all the circumstances that made the service rendered by that member exemplary.

I recommend to all, take the time to access one and read it before you pass judgement.

We in the profession of arms must stick together.

Be happy for and proud of our members for their achievements.

WO2 Chris McLeod
1 Armd Regt
Roberston Barracks

TOP

Unfair criticism

I FEEL a response in justified to the letter from Mr Bernie McGurgan about coverage of chopper pilot Capt Scott Watkins (Edition 1112, December 16).

I am curious as to how Mr McGurgan could possibly know that the story was sensationalised by the media?

The only way he would know this is if he was the co-pilot of the helicopter that had been hit by enemy fire, with the pilot wounded and in need of urgent medical attention, and not knowing the full extent of the damage to the helicopter but landing it on safe ground in spite of all that.

If he meets this criteria, he should know the pressure that the co-pilot must have been enduring, thus he would not "belittle" his achievement.

If he has never been in that predicament, he should keep his critisism to himself or maybe send a letter to Capt Watkins telling him how the events were just part of his day's work.

Either way, I would suggest that if more people just said "well done" when another gets recognition instead of airing petty jealousies, we would all be better off.

WO2 Murray Brissett
CSM Romani Coy

TOP

Hat stand

I AM writing regarding the reply from ASODs to my letter about the wearing of the slouch hat (Edition 1112, December 16).

The reply is quite correct, however the intent of my letter was not what orders of dress the hat is worn with, but the way it is being worn when the brim is up.

The brim remains horizontal when worn brim down, but regrettably most wear it this way with the brim up and it is about time it was worn the way it used to be and, indeed, the way it is shown in ASODs - angled with brim up according to the measurements.

WO2 Dave O'Reilly
HQ JLC
VBM


TOP

PNG thanks

ON BEHALF of the officers and men of 2 Bn, Royal Pacific Islands Rgt, I would like to thank the Australian Defence Staff PNG, members of 17 Const Sqn and their attached personnel for their outstanding efforts in the refurbishment of Moem Barracks Wewak during Exercise Pukpuk 2004.

These young men and women, along with members of our own PNGDF, gave of their sweat and toil to make Moem Barracks a more efficient and productive workplace for the soldiers of the 2nd Battalion.

The people of Papua New Guinea and, in particular, the people of Wewak thank the people of Australia for their ongoing friendship and generosity.

Lt-Col W.
Janguan Commanding Officer
2RPIR

TOP

 

HOW TO WRITE TO ARMY NEWS

It is the right of all soldiers to correspond with Army. Soldiers wishing to air their views through letters to the editor have access to the newspaper without using the chain of command.

Letters will be edited for spelling and grammatical errors and newspaper style, and may be edited for space.

Preference is given to typed letters of fewer than 300 words. Letters will be rejected where they are too long, abusive, cover a subject that has been exhausted or can be answered in the author's unit.

They will be published only when they include the author's name, unit (where applicable), location and contact number.

Send letters to: The Editor, Army Newspaper, R8-LG-029, Russell Offices, Dept of Defence, Canberra, ACT 2600; fax (02) 6265 6690 or e-mail: armynews@defencenews.gov.au (Please note this is not an internal e-mail address and therefore requires Sec: Unclassified in the subject line when sending from a DRN terminal)

The opinions expressed in letters to the editor do not represent the views of the editor or the Army.

 
Top Stories | Letters | Features | Personnel | Technology | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us