|
Check
'chits' with doctors
COMMANDERS
with concerns about medical "chits" have been reminded
to check with medical practitioners before making a decision.
Director
Personnel-Army Col Mike Milford said the consequences of ignoring
a medical chit could aggravate a medical condition, cause a serious
complication or, in extreme cases, endanger a member's life.
"One
of the recommendations of the Burchett Inquiry into Military Justice
in the ADF concerned medical certificates and the way commanders
should deal with them," he said.
The
certificates or "chits" are issued by authorised service
or civilian medical officers on official ADF medical forms and might
recommend a number of days sick leave or some form of restricted
duty for members suffering medical conditions.
Chits
are normally passed by members to their immediate superiors and
there is usually no problem with acceptance of medical advice.
Difficulties
could arise, however, when supervisors believed in a particular
case, the restriction or time off work was not warranted.
There
may be doubt in the mind of the supervisors about the severity of
the injury or illness, or that the medical officer has been too
conservative in his or her assessment of a soldier's condition.
He
said the first consideration should be the welfare of the member,
and commanders should consider very carefully any decision not to
comply with a chit.
"Part
of that consideration should be an acknowledgement that they will
be pitting their judgement against that of a qualified medical practitioner,"
he said.
"The
recommendations on the chit should not be ignored without first
taking up any issues with the medical practitioner.
"For
example, any evidence that might cast doubt on a member's claim
to be suffering certain symptoms, should be provided to the medical
officer.
"Discussions
with the medical officer should resolve most issues, but where that
is not possible for any reason, a second medical opinion could be
sought.
He
said there also might be rare occasions when the need for the particular
skills of a member at a particular time may cause his or her commanders
to be reluctant to observe medical restrictions or provide time
off work.
Such
a scenario would be more likely during operations, but Service needs
were a legitimate consideration when decisions of this nature were
being made.
Any
final decision to not follow the recommendations on a chit should
be made only by the commanding officer or senior unit representative
authorised by the CO to do so, such as the unit 2IC.
"Challenges
to medical chits should be the exception rather than the rule, but
commanders are there to command and they have the authority to make
decisions," Col Milford said.
"In
doing so, they must carefully and responsibly weigh up all the factors,
particularly members' health and safety and operational imperatives,
and be prepared to stand by their decisions."
|