Army :: The Soldier's Newspaper

Contents
Top Stories
Letters
Features

Computing
Entertainment
Health and Fitness
Only Joking

Sport
About us
Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Letters to the Editor

 

Ups and downs of C130s


I AM very interested in what maintenance program the RAAF has in place for their fleet of C130J aircraft.

The reasons I ask this questions are as follows; I was booked on a RAAF C130J flight home after three months in Rifle Coy Butterworth in November 2002 - the flight was delayed for two days. The next was in last October. A RAAF C130J flight home after five months in Timor, the flight once again delayed for one day.

The trip home from Timor was to be in three chalks and out of three aircraft two of them had engine problems on the same day at the same base.

These aircraft were the new model as well. Was it engine problems or aircrew problems, I wonder.

Two deployments in two years and, two delays thanks to our old friend "Ronnie RAAF" (civvies in uniform). Could someone please tell me who is responsible for the maintenance of these aircraft? How often are they serviced? and who monitors it?

Maybe in times of cost cutting in the ADF it is time to rid ourselves of these unreliable aircraft, or aircrew, and count on Qantas for all troop movement.

This would surely save millions of dollars, which in turn could then be channelled to places of need, bullets maybe!
Sgt W.A.Southern
Catering Pl
1RAR, Lavarack Barracks, Townsville

Air-Cdre G. Evans, Commander Air Lift Group, responds:
I regret that we let Sgt Southern down on these two flights. He should be aware of the circumstances in both cases, though, and I reject his allegation that the aircrew were in any way at fault.

The task in November of 2002 was delayed because the C-130J, enroute to Butterworth to pick up the rifle company, had to divert to Singapore with an avionics problem.

This action by the crew was entirely appropriate and correct in the circumstances. At the time all available C-130 and 707 aircraft had higher priority tasks or were too distant to get there before repairs could be carried out to the C-130J. That aircraft was therefore used when it was repaired.

The task to redeploy troops from Dili to Townsville in October 2003 was one of a complex series of tasks, and again, the C-130 force was 100 per cent committed at the time. One C-130H and two C-130J were tasked to deploy troops to Dili from Darwin, then redeploy troops from Darwin to Townsville.

Unfortunately, both aircraft suffered serious problems but these emergencies very well handled by the crews.

The problems were very much out of character for the new C-130J aircraft that have generally proven highly reliable in service.

My aircrew are not "civvies in uniform". They are a crucial part of virtually every ADF operation, including recent operations in Timor, Bougainville, Honiara, Afghanistan and Iraq. Their workload is among the highest of any group in the ADF and their professionalism is widely respected around the world.

They routinely face military hazard, and they support almost every ADF operation from beginning to end.

The ADF does not have sufficient military air lift assets (not even the USAF does), so we must work the aircraft and crews we have as efficiently as possible.

This we do, every day, primarily in support of the Army, an organisation I have great respect and admiration for. My aircrew universally feel the same way.

For the record, routine maintenance on C-130 aircraft is conducted by the squadrons, and deeper maintenance is contracted to industry, in this case Qantas Defence Services. Both these organisations do an excellent job; our safety record attests to that.

I agree an infantryman has every right to see himself as a high priority for movement in the AO, but we should remember this: the bullets Sgt Southern proposes we buy with the C-130 budget are entirely useless unless delivered to the troops who need them. And the Army can trust my aircrew to deliver them in the face of enemy action.

We're doing it in the Middle East today.

Bursting blister theories

WITH reference to "Fighting the foot's old foe" article published in Army dated November 20, 2003, on blisters.

I've now heard the lot! I've been a soldier for 22 years and I'm amazed that we, the Army, are now about to conduct trials on cutting down on blisters.

Surely all the RODUMS sent in from EM and Iraq have not been mislpaced? In 22 years service, I have walked, patroled, marched and run more kilometres than I wish to remember including three years as corporal instructor at Depot Coy School of Inf and the 80km hell marches in 6RAR in the early '90s.

I've worn all sorts of makes and models of boots. From black leather Dunlops and highmarks to brown leather and suede boots, and now the "gootchie" [Gucci] looking things that we wear today.

They look great with jeans and T-shirts don't they? Never before have I had problems with blisters until I was issued my 285/107 Monopoints. I get blisters just walking from my office to the dunny now; We've finally been issued Gortex raincoats after years of soldiers complaining about being soaking wet whilst wearing Army issue wet weather gear so why don't we now listen to the people that really matter, soldiers, and issue a boot that works.

The plastic cup in the heel of the monopoints simply does not work. It's simple and I believe this is the answer to the blister trials.

One other point - the Brits have great socks they issue. They're expensive and I don't know the name of them but they can be aquired through the British Army School of Infantry at Brecon, Wales.
Sgt D. Parsons
ARA Training Sergeant
Geraldton

Maj Nick Stanton, ACPEC, responds:
The writer raises a number of complex and diverse issues which makes a concise response a difficult challenge. First, ACPEC was created to ensure that our soldier's opinions were heard and resolved. RODUMs are an essential element to this process and provide invaluable support to the Army in a number of areas.

They are never discarded.

It was our soldier's input through RODUMs, ACPEC and general discussions which brought about the long awaited new wet weather ensemble.

It is pleasing to note that this great piece of kit is appreciated as a large number of people worked extremely hard to ensure we received the best wet weather gear possible.

In regards to the anti-blister trial; as the article mentioned, pretty well all experienced soldiers have an opinion as to what causes blisters and the best means to prevent them. Now these differing opinions and ideas are going to be scientifically tested to arrive at the best solution for our soldiers.

A methodical approach will ensure the optimal solution to the concerns that have been raised by our soldiers.

Stop your whingeing

As a Unit Pay Representative, when my copy of Army arrived, I used to rush to the letters page to see the latest issues affecting soldiers, and the replies from "the horses mouth".

These letters were often the catalyst for a change of policy, or at least a simple explanation of it. Now all we get is wah, wah, wah. Admittedly, there is the occasional legitimate gripe, but as a whole, all we get to read about is how badly done-by we all are.

Every fortnight, the majority of letters seem to start off "if I was a civilian, this wouldn't happen to me", or "if I wasn't in the ADF, I would have a choice about ..."

Isn't it about time people realised that they aren't civilians, they are in the ADF, and if they have a problem with their choices or their working conditions - get out! Suddenly, paying $7.60 a fortnight for water will pale into insigficance against their medical bills.

Maybe someone should be asking questions like "Why have AIRN if you have to re-do everything in the weeks prior to a deployment?" or "Why do I have a Service Number, a PMKeys number, and a ROMAN vendor number, when if we bought the full financial module for PMKeys, then we could all make do with one number?"

Aren't these the major issues we should be putting to our commanders?

I'm still waiting for the letter complaining that we only get one-ply toilet paper in the ADF, but if we were civilians, we would get three-ply.
Cpl Troy Schmidt
26 Tpt Sqn
Puckapunyal VIC

Green beats chrome

I HAVE been reading the Army newspaper since deployed on operations in the Middle East. I was disappointed to discover on page four on the December 4 edition that Army has reintroduced a chrome magazine for colour escorts. As a non-Army observer, I am quite happy with the current look of green translucent polymer on parade. I can't imagine the chrome magazine looking better against the black and green Steyr.
Cmdr Phil White, RAN
HQJTF

Awards system a joke

I FIND it impossible to believe that out of the 500 or so personnel involved in Op Falconer that there is only two non-commissioned personnel who received awards [in the special Op Falconer honours list in December last year].

One brigadier, four colonels, six lieutentant-colonels, one major and two captains all received awards.

Doesn't it seem surprising that out of all the personnel over there that only officers showed exceptional performance.

If this is the case then maybe we need to employ officers as diggers to get the improved performance shown here.

The awards system needs to be looked at.

Time and time again I see people who get awards for doing their job or for being one of the boys. I have lost faith in the Army awards as I see them as nothing more than a joke on what was once based on skill and performance.
Cpl Scott Timmins,
5 Avn Regt
RAAF Townsville, QLD

An unusual rank

FOLLOWING the article on warrant ranks by Pte John Wellfare [Army, November 20], I thought you might be interested in the following about a WO Class 3 (PSM) who is listed on a memorial wall at Kanchanaburi War Cemetery in Thailand.

He was WO 3rd Class (PSM) James Love of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders. He died May 29, 1943.

I had never heard of such a rank but anything is possible in a Scottish regiment.
Maj Ray Doust (RACT, Rtd)

I will miss you all

AFTER 37 years service as a member of the Public Service, employed with CARO and SCMA since 1973, I would like to take this opportunity on my retirement to say farewell to those members of the Australian Army and Defence Public Service who I have had the pleasure to have known and worked with.

It has been an absolute pleasure working with such dedicated and professional people and I will miss you all.

Good luck for the future.
David Gibson
SO1 CARO/SCMA

Ten hot tips on returning to work

Be positive and cheerful.
Make an effort to say good morning to everyone.
Avoid excessive alcohol the night before as this will increase fatigue.
Have a lunch break and enjoy it.
Be decisive to organise your admin, like dental and medical.
Meet the new people in your workplace with no judgment of character; the first week back is a little surreal for most.
Ask questions about everything you might have forgotten or need to find out about, knowledge is power and makes the transition back to work easier.
Pick a day to bring mornos for your section.
Make a commitment to earn your pay even when you are suffering from holiday withdrawal.
Don't be too hard on yourself and the routine, as it will become easier as your settle into your job and unit again.

Ask the Chief

Would you like to ask CA Lt-Gen Peter Leahy a question? It could be about acquisitions or uniform, operational tempo or a general welfare issue.

As part of hearing soldiers' views, CA has agreed to start Ask the Chief in Army newspaper.

He wants to know your questions so he can answer them in a future edition as part of his look back at what the Army has achieved and been part of in 2003.

As with Letters to the Editor, it is the right of all soldiers to ask CA a question through Ask the Chief in Army without using the chain of command.

Submit your questions in e-mail form to armynews@defencenews.gov.au with "ask the chief" in the subject line.

From the kids...

Hey,
This letter is to anyone and everyone who wants to read it.
Whoever this reaches in Iraq, I just want to tell you what courage and strength you have. There are people who agree with this war and people who don't and people who haven't made up their minds yet. And that's all cool, what matters is that whatever you believe you're still out there fighting, because that's your job, that's what you're were told to do. Maybe you're terrified. I know I would be, but whatever you're feeling, you're out there giving it your best shot.
Keep smiling and keep supporting each other through this hard time.
On ya guys, love Laura, Melbourne.

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOW TO WRITE TO ARMY NEWS

It is the right of all soldiers to correspond with Army. Soldiers wishing to air their views through letters to the editor have access to the newspaper without using the chain of command. Letters will be edited for spelling, grammatical errors and newspaper style and may be edited for space. Preference is given to typed letters of fewer than 300 words. Letters will be rejected where they are too long, abusive, cover a subject that has been exhausted or can be answered in the author’s unit. They will be published only when they include the author’s name, unit (where applicable), location and contact number.
Send letters to: The Editor, Army Newspaper, R8-LG-029, Russell Offices, Dept of Defence, Canberra, ACT, 2600. Phone (02) 6266 7612, fax (02) 6265 6690 or e-mail
armynews@defencenews.gov.au
(Please note this is not an internal e-mail address and therefore requires Sec: Unclassified in the subject box when sending from a Defence-network terminal)

The opinions expressed in letters to the editor do not represent the views of the editor or the Army.

Top Stories | Letters | Features | Personnel | Technology | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us