Australian Government, Department of Defence
MinisterNavyArmyAir ForceDepartment
 
Defending Australia and its National Interests
Army :: The Soldier's Newspaper

Contents
Top Stories
Letters
Features

Computing
Entertainment
Health and Fitness
Only Joking

Sport
About us
Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Letters to the Editor

 

Thanks for your support

TAYLOR Anne McGregor was a special little girl who touched everyone who knew her, from learning to walk and using the play ground equipment at the Army Logistic Sergeants Mess (ALSM), Bandiana.

Taylor would brighten a room just because she was in it. Taylor was cheerful, playful, soft, warm, loving, cuddly and a very brave beautiful little girl.

Taylor passed away in our arms on October 1, at only 21 months old in the ICU at the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne.

Candy and I would like to express our sincere appreciation for all the support that Defence has given us through this difficult time we have had and are still having, with the loss of our little girl.

CO PSD Lt-Col Shaun Fletcher ALTC and the staff led by OC HSW Maj Kim Sullivan were extremely supportive and genuine to the needs of Taylor while she was in ICU and allowed my wife and I to be by Taylor's side. I can not express the feeling of the overwhelming support we have had by my unit. This support includes the civilian organisation (RMIT and Tenix) and other personnel.

It makes me even more proud to be in such a caring, supportive and professional organisation and a message I am more than willing to tell anyone I encounter.

Once again, sincere thanks to the staff (military and civilian) at ALTC and a special thank you to the PMC and members of the ALSM for acknowledging our beautiful little girl with a wonderful contribution.
WO2 Ross McGregor
Health Services Wing,
ALTC Bandiana VIC

Trend in DCO

TO ENSURE total anominity for persons contained within these reports my name must be witheld, I am an RSM of a battalion.

Let me say from the outset that the Defence Community Organisation (DCO) does a tremendous job but as the uniforms diminish from this organisation so is the effectiveness of their reporting.

In my position within the battalion I view all DCO reports and in particular I would like to comment on an alarming trend emerging from reports supporting posting retentions.

This observation is based on reports received from several areas and is almost certainly shared by my colleagues.

These reports are now not only a one-sided view but an absolute "clutch" for any possible reason to help the member remain within the area of their choice, even when totally outweighed by reason and the needs of the service.

The DCO investigators must have a responsibility to identify needs of the service and currently, in some areas, this is being totally ignored.

I believe that reports like I have been receiving lately have greatly diminished the effectiveness of the report due to their one-sided nature.

If you want the reports to be received in earnest, then balance the argument against the needs of the service. This will ensure they receive total support from those reading them.
Name and address supplied
Col Ross Boyd, acting Director-General Defence Community Organisation, responds:
DCO social workers provide social assessments on request, to assist commanders, career managers and recruiters to make good decisions on matters affecting their people.

Typically, assessments are sought to determine whether members have compassionate grounds for reposting to, or retention in, a locality; suitability for recruitment into the ADF or for an overseas assignment, and eligibility to certain entitlements - such as those related to dependants with special needs.

Frequently there will be a tension between what the member wants, the needs of the service and the legal entitlement.

The task of a social worker, therefore, is not an easy one. Their goal is to present workable recommendations that will assist commanders and staff make decisions that will both enable the member to meet their responsibilities and service commitments, while at the same time, giving regard to the growing desire of members to balance these obligations with those to their families.

By and large, the feedback from commanders is that DCO achieves this difficult task.

I acknowledge, however, that there will always be room for improvement. DCO is currently embarking on a process of organisational renewal to enhance the quality of its service.

As a part of this renewal, quality assurance and continuous improvement strategies are being put in place to better monitor the standard and the function of reports in the decision making process.

To this end, I welcome the RSM's feedback.

Noting that his observations are couched in general terms because of privacy and confidentiality requirements, I invite him to discuss his concerns with his DCO Regional Director or Area Manager or to contact me in person, so that the particular issues can be addressed.

$88, please

In response to WO1 Chris Ross' letter (Army, Edition 1085, October 23) I would just like to say on behalf of the 10,000 or so Defence personnel in the three brigades, three RAAF bases, numerous Naval installations and the plethora of other Army depots, bases, units and training areas of Queensland that the issue of the Queensland Ambulance Tax is quite worthy of the ink the editor is awarding it.

My only hope is that you can bring the positive attitude you displayed in the letter and your WO1 pay level with you on your next posting to Qld.

This may prevent you from the feeling of frustration of the additional wasted tax we currently pay each quarter.

And finally, Sir, despite patiently checking my mailbox each afternoon for the past fortnight, I am still yet to receive your cheque to me. It is after all, only $88.
Sgt Lachy McGraa
136 Sig Sqn
Enoggera, Qld

Coverage for all

THANK you for your e-mails of September 1 and 12, 2003, on behalf of Ms Sandra Beatty and Capt John Hymus concerning the Community Ambulance Cover.

I have been requested to reply to you on the Premier's behalf.

The Premier referred this matter to the Honourable Terry Mackenroth MP, Deputy Premier, Treasurer and Minister for Sport who has advised that the previous Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS) subscription scheme relied on voluntary payments that directly entitled individuals to a particular benefit.

The levy is different. The levy ensures a secure funding base for the QAS by collecting an amount on electricity accounts.

This has enabled the QAS to provide free emergency ambulance transport to all Queenslanders. Without a secure funding base, this commitment could not be made.

Because the levy is not a direct fee for service, it applies to electricity accounts regardless of the number of people residing in a residence, their incomes and /or the marital or other status of the account holder. Everyone who receives an electricity account and does not qualify for an exemption will be required to pay the levy, regardless of their private health cover arrangements or if their employer covers them.

If a person lives in a Commonwealth facility such as a military barracks and they do not receive an electricity account, they will not be required to pay the Community Ambulance Cover levy. If a person lives in their own home or rental property and receives an electricity account, they will be required to pay the levy.

The question of reimbursement of the Community Ambulance Cover levy is an internal matter for the ADF and its employees.

Mr Mackenroth further advises that health funds were advised of the changes to the Queensland ambulance cover arrangements, as was the Commonwealth Government which is responsible for approving health insurance premiums.

The Queensland Government's decision to provide free ambulance services to Queensland residents will result in reduced costs to Defence Health. The fund's decision to effectively share that saving across all members through its national approach to benefits and premiums is a matter for the fund and its members.

Under the Community Ambulance Cover Scheme, all Defence members and their families who are Queensland residents are eligible to use the QAS. For instance, if a Defence member or their dependent was unfortunate enough to suffer an injury or illness while at a public shopping centre and required emergency ambulance transport, the individual would not be charged for that service.

Under the previous QAS Subscription Scheme, if the person was a QAS subscriber they would not have received a bill.

However, if they were not a subscriber under the previous scheme, they would have been sent an account. It would then be a matter for the individual to arrange payment, whether that be made by themselves, the ADF or their private health insurer.

When military personnel are transferred interstate and are no longer Queensland residents, I would encourage them to check with the local State or Territory ambulance authority to ensure they and their families are adequately covered in that jurisdiction.
Rob Whiddon
Chief of Staff,
Premier's Office, Brisbane QLD

Where's my medal, again

I APPLIED for the second clasp to my DFSM in September 2002, with my entitlement being July 2002.

Twice earlier this year I managed to speak with someone and was given two timelines, both of which were exceeded.

Friday October 17, I received an e-mail response thanking me for my inquiry dated June 24, and that my inquiry would be treated as an application. The e-mail went on further to say that reserve's applications would take longer to process.

There was nothing in the e-mail that actually answered my questions.

I replied that day stating that I am not a reserve and that my query should not to be used as an initial application. I also asked for a proper answer to my initial email.

Monday October 20, I received another e-mail response thanking me for another of my enquiries dated July 2, and guess what? - it was exactly the same letter, word for word, that I received three days earlier and it still did not address my questions. Obviously a "form" letter sent to all who dare to send a query.

It is one thing that these e-mails are taking months to respond to, but it is not good enough that "form" letters are apparently being sent automatically, without the person having the courtesy to even read the query.

Are the ADF Medals section so under staffed and if so - why?
Capt Allan Gray
QM 16 AD Regt
Woodside Barracks, SA

Karen Creet, Director Honours and Awards, responds:
The Directorate of Honours and Awards (DHA) receives hundreds of medal enquiries every day, and it is our policy that each query be acknowledged, even if only with a standard response.

We have recently revised procedures in relation to the e-mail queries, to streamline the process and ensure that individuals' concerns are dealt with in a timely manner.

We have investigated Capt Gray's application for the second clasp of his DFSM. Capt Gray's clasp was approved by the Governor-General in February 2003 along with several hundred others.

Unfortunately, due to what we presume is an administrative error, his particular clasp appears not to have been sent.

We have rectified this anomaly, and Capt Gray can expect to receive his second clasp soon. Honours and Awards apologise for the delay, and for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Where's the tax info

I WISH to draw attention to a financial issue that impacts on a large number of ADF personnel. Substantial tax exemptions may soon be applied to personnel who have served, or are serving, in the following regions: Afghanistan, Albania, Bougainville, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Cambodia, Cook Islands, Ethiopia, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Mozambique, Palau, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu.

The Defence Tax Management Office (DTMO) released a Defgram 98/2003 dated February 27, 2003 which stated that publication of Tax Supplements was imminent. The supplements are to be based on advice from the Australian Tax Office (ATO) and the Defence Personnel Executive (DPE), and were to be progressively released from March 2003.

Since then, I have been in frequent contact with DTMO seeking release dates for the supplements. To their credit DTMO personnel have been polite and timely in their responses. They have not yet been able to specify when supplements will finally be published.

I appreciate the complexity of the issue and the need for liasion between Defence and the ATO. I am concerned that DTMO promulgation of information on the supplement has not been sufficiently extensive. Defgrams do not necessarily reach the wider Defence community and further promulgation via Defence media seems appropriate, hence this letter.

Direct contact with ex-serving members would also seem fair.

For many personnel this issue involves a significant amount of money. It has been at least 10 years since some of the listed deployments occurred. The financial implications for some soldiers might be very significant and affect important life decisions.

The service is always quick to recover overpayments to soldiers. It would be nice to have that brisk approach applied to payments to soldiers that are long overdue.

Finally, I request that DTMO reply to this letter and advise a release date, detail how they are going to keep all members (including ex-serving members) advised and undertake to announce in Defence newspapers when supplements are available.
Maj John Roberts
4CER
Ringwood Depot, Vic

Editor's Note: A reply from the DTMO will be published in the next edition

OPSEC? Not likely

IN RESPONSE to Defgram 453/2003:

With the ever-present reform and renaming of military units I bet not even the combined might of the CIA, MI5 and ASIO would be able to glean any OPSEC info from my posting history:
School of Army Health (Healsville)? Go-ooone.
2nd Military Hospital? Go-ooone.
1MD Pers Depot Go-ooone.
1st Military Hospital? Go-ooone.
3 Camp Hospital? Go-ooone.
School of Army Health (Portsea)? Go-ooone.
1st Prevent Med Coy? Go-ooone.
Army Malaria Research Unit? Go-ooone.
Tom Travers (ex-WO2)
Army Malaria Institute
Gallipoli Barracks, Enoggerra QLD

Looking for old mates

Greetings from the US.

I am a Vietnam veteran and flew helicopters and I am looking for the following Australian veterans, some of whom may have been Vietnam veterans: Herron, Lynton M; Keene , Robert; Partridge, Thomas R.; Williams, Neville G.

These gentlemen were in the US Army Flight Class ORWAC 69-10 in 1968-1969. I was in that class and I am working on a reunion and want to find these men. Any ideas to help?

Here is our website: www.whitehats6910.com
Jim Godfrey
8120 Sunscape Lane S.
Fort Worth, Texas 76123
817-294-2797 Home
817-371-7033 Cell
jimgodf@flash.net

Ah, the old AAB 83

ONCE again I have received a print-out of my record of service and once again 50 per cent of it is wrong. This is in spite of having compiled a small rainforest worth of paperwork over the years trying to get details corrected.

When will the "system", Ausmis, PMKeys or any of the other electronic wizardry personnel management programs, be capable of correctly recording members details?

My concern is that retired soldiers in the future, when seeking entitlements, compensation or pensions, will find themselves arguing with some bureaucrat who will maintain that the records are correct.

It seems odd, but not surprising, that when we kept manual records in the AAB 83 they were always correct.
WO2 G. M. Potter
SM GBAD, Arty Trade Policy
HQ CATC, Puckapunyal VIC

Calling Saharan vets

I REQUEST your assistance to help locate members of the 5th ASC MINURSO.

This contingent served in the Western Sahara from November '94 to May '95 and comprised 45 soldiers. The majority of these were from RASigs Units.

We are attempting to organise a 10-year reunion of these members, however, I have found over time many contact numbers have just slipped away.

Although I am no longer a member of the ARA I am hoping that many I served with on this mission are, or at least read Army either in print or on the Web.

We will attempt to formalise details of this event only after we have made every endeavour to get in touch with our old mates.
David Manning
Ph 0403 008 607
SA Police, Adelaide
E-mail davem_as@yahoo.com

Ask the Chief

Would you like to ask CA Lt-Gen Peter Leahy a question? It could be about acquisitions or uniform, operational tempo or a general welfare issue.

As part of hearing soldiers' views, CA has agreed to start Ask the Chief in Army newspaper.

He wants to know your questions so he can answer them in a future edition as part of his look back at what the Army has achieved and been part of in 2003.

As with Letters to the Editor, it is the right of all soldiers to ask CA a question through Ask the Chief in Army without using the chain of command.

Submit your questions in e-mail form to armynews@defencenews.gov.au with "ask the chief" in the subject line.

From the kids...

To an extremely BRAVE person,

I can't pretend to imagine what you're going through. It's hard enough to think that it's 'just a job' for you. I don't know how hard it must be fighting a war. All that aside, you're doing an amazing job. I undersand that that's what you guys are trained for. That is some consolation.
I don't really know what else to say except come back safe and stay sane in all the madness. You have my thoughts and my support.
Lucas, in Melbourne.
PS: if you know Scott Richter (I don't know his rank or unit but he's there somewhere) tell him his cousin Lucas is thinking of him THANKS SO MUCH!

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOW TO WRITE TO ARMY NEWS

It is the right of all soldiers to correspond with Army. Soldiers wishing to air their views through letters to the editor have access to the newspaper without using the chain of command. Letters will be edited for spelling, grammatical errors and newspaper style and may be edited for space. Preference is given to typed letters of fewer than 300 words. Letters will be rejected where they are too long, abusive, cover a subject that has been exhausted or can be answered in the author’s unit. They will be published only when they include the author’s name, unit (where applicable), location and contact number.
Send letters to: The Editor, Army Newspaper, R8-LG-029, Russell Offices, Dept of Defence, Canberra, ACT, 2600. Phone (02) 6266 7612, fax (02) 6265 6690 or e-mail
armynews@defencenews.gov.au
(Please note this is not an internal e-mail address and therefore requires Sec: Unclassified in the subject box when sending from a Defence-network terminal)

The opinions expressed in letters to the editor do not represent the views of the editor or the Army.

Top Stories | Letters | Features | Personnel | Technology | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us