|
Conflict
networks
By
Cpl Jonathan Garland
Technology Reporter
MILITARY and civilian planners from around the world gathered at
the Australian War Memorial in Canberra on May 20 to discuss the
role of Network-Centric Warfare (NCW) in the recent Middle East
conflict and in future warfare.
The
conference described NCW as treating platforms as nodes of a network
since all elements of the network are securely connected,
they can collect, share, and access information.
CDF
Gen Peter Cosgrove said NCW was built on two dimensions that were
closely related and mutually reinforcing the human and network
dimensions.
The
human dimension is based on mission command and our commitment to
professional mastery, while the network dimension represents the
technical side of NCW, he said.
As
information and network-related warfighting techniques start to
mature and to predominate, outcomes will be swifter, as dramatic
and paradoxically less bloody than the classic force-on-force, attritionist
paradigm of the past.
Gen
Cosgrove went on to give some examples of NCW from the recent conflict
in the Middle East.
He
cited the Op Falconer home page, which posted information throughout
the campaign and enabled everybody in the entire command chain to
access up-to-date and relevant information.
As
another example, he spoke about the ability to monitor the location
and movement of coalition forces by GPS technology.
This
was a huge advantage to commanders and to the staff who supported
them from an intelligence and fire support view and the technology
proliferated in the Coalition ground forces.
It
is cheap, simple and available technology and works effectively,
acknowledging some environmental limitations which we know quite
well.
We
need to bring NCW to the forefront of our thinking about future
war, because this idea will make us more effective at warfighting.
|