. Logo of the Australian Department of Defence MinisterspacerNavyspacerArmyspacerAir ForcespacerDepartment
Army :: The Soldier's Newspaper

Contents











Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Personnel and Policy

Service allowance review


The proposed tiered approach to SA is based on the premise that there is a cumulative effect of the liability and that there is a corresponding discount applying to those personnel with minimum length of service.

As was indicated in the last edition of Army, the ADF is reviewing two options for service allowance (SA):

  • Introducing a tiered rate that is linked to years of service; and
  • Maintaining the current flat rate.

SA has existed in some form since 1950 when ADF members were awarded an undefined loading payment introduced to make service life more attractive.

The allowance has been reviewed regularly and considers:

  • The requirement to be on call and the liability to work long and irregular hours including weekends and public holidays and shifts.
  • The turbulence in postings caused by the liability to be moved frequently and often at short notice, to meet the needs of the service and the effects of this on the member and the member’s family;
  • The requirement to submit to discipline and control in personal and employment matters in which a civilian generally has some freedom of choice; and
  • The requirement at times to live and work in uncomfortable conditions.

It should be noted the Defence Force Remuneration Tribunal (DFRT) stated in the last review (1994) that there was a “… tendency for the impact of factors to average out over service careers,” and a “… general acceptance of the allowance as representing an averaging of the disabilities across the differing circumstances, postings and commitments of ADF members”.

The proposed tiered approach to SA is based on the premise that there is a cumulative effect of the liability and that there is a corresponding discount applying to those personnel with minimum length of service.

It has been proposed that the tiering should target significant separation points, however these points vary according to service and employment group.

The flat rate option continues the historical basis of SA. It is a simple approach that rewards on the all of one company principle, recognising that the liability is shared by all personnel and that there are different impacts across their career.

Considering that the tiered option is a significant departure from the extant rationale, a detailed review is required.

The DFRT has set April 22-23 next year for the SA review.

Army staff view is that the review should be conducted using the existing criteria to ensure that a robust case is developed and adequate compensation is provided for the changes that have occurred in SA since it was last reviewed in 1994.

At this stage, the Chiefs of Services Committee will consider the issue of service allowance in this month.

The AHQ point of contact is the SO2 Remuneration, Maj Bruce Jennings, (02) 6265 5296 e-mail bruce.jennings@defence.gov.au

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top Stories | Letters | Features | Finance | Computing | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us | Home