|
Blown
up in the name of science
27 tonnes of explosives rocks Woomera
 |
|
The
explosion at Woomera Range created a visible pressure bubble
in the atmosphere, seen in this oblique photo. Photo by 92
Wing Photographic
|
By
Darryl Johnston
ALL eyes were fixed on a tiny speck in the horizon shimmering in
the desert heat outside Woomera. Two guideposts protruding from
the sand pointed toward the object.
At
four minutes to detonation Minister for Defence Robert Hill gave
the all-clear by hand-held radio to the men positioned in an underground
control and firing bunker 800m from Ground Zero.
More
than 150 people had travelled to the South Australian outback to
witness the blast.
They
included Army and Air Force personnel, Defence and industry representatives
from the UK, Singapore, the Netherlands and Norway, and observers
from Malaysia, Germany and the United Arab Emirates. Representatives
from Australian Defence-related industries and Woomera residents
joined them.
The
large crowd stood at an observation point a safe 6km from Ground
Zero. Spectators began jostling for prime locations to witness the
impending blast, cameras were fixed into position and everyone waited
in an atmosphere of anticipation.
An
RAAF aircraft with a film crew on board flew overhead toward ground
zero then a muffled countdown came over the speaker: Five
... four ...three ...two ...one.
Out
of the desert came a bright flash. Red earth heaved into the sky.
A huge black cloud formed and grew bigger and bigger. As it rose
into the cloudless sky it took on the shape of a giant mushroom.
The
soundwave hit 12 seconds later, a loud and low rumble that caught
many by surprise. It was greeted with cheers from the crowd.
After
more than two years of detailed planning, the 27-tonne Woomera Explosives
Trial was over in a matter of seconds.
All
that was left at Ground Zero was a giant pile of rubble at the bottom
of a huge crater and a large black cloud that gradually dispersed
as it drifted to the southeast. Behind the scenes valuable data
had been collected that will put to good use in the future.
The
site had been extensively instrumented with multiple sensors to
measure blast pressure.
The
information was relayed by 10km of fibre-optic cable and 35km of
data cable laid underground like a giant spider web.
Thirty
cameras in protective housings recorded the explosion. The effect
of the blast on five fixed domestic structures was also recorded.
The
massive explosion resulted from the simultaneous detonation of 1620
8-inch howitzer shells. They were housed in a purpose-built explosive
storage house.
The
purpose of the trial was to obtain data from which safety criteria
for explosive storage and handling can be determined and modelled;
including whether NATO-mandated buffer zones around stored explosives
should be adjusted.
Army
specialists from the Directorate of Trials within DSTO planned and
managed the trial. The UKs Defence Ordnance Safety Group sponsored
it. The explosion was the latest in a series of huge static storage
blasts conducted under a memorandum of understanding for
Defence
research between the UK Ministry of Defence and the Australian Department
of Defence.
The
Netherlands, Norway and Singapore also participated in the trial.
The last trial took place in 1999 and involved 40 tonnes of high
explosives.
Another
blast took place on October 7 to determine the effects of a detonation
of five tonnes of high explosives in field storage conditions.
It
gathered data for safety criteria for explosive storage when armed
forces are deployed on operations, particularly peacekeeping deployments.
|
Trial
facts and figures
|
|
Concrete:
750 tonnes of concrete was used in the construction of ammunition
storage buildings and other structures.
Soil:
5200 tonnes of soil was moved to cover the ammunition storage
buildings and to build protective barriers for some other
structures.
|
Cable:
10km of fibre optic cable and 35km of data cable was laid
around the test area. The cable was used to carry information
on the blast.
Buildings:
Four residential buildings (two were used in the trial); Three
Singaporean structures; Two commercial building sites with
a total of 6 commercial buildings; One Norwegian house complete
with refrigerator, wineglasses, double-glazed windows and
a Baltic pine staircase; Several field structures including
command and control structures, an element of a field hospital,
modular/tented accommodation and observation towers.
|
|