By
Graham Howatt Armed Forces Federation
In
a recent edition of Navy News, the Federation drew attention
to what we see as policy shortcomings regarding members purchasing
a “suitable own home” in a posting location.
This article provides more food for thought in regard to equity
and greater support for the ADF homeowner/occupier.
The ADF is well recognised as a mobile force and most members
are provided with accommodation assistance in various forms
to assist them meeting regular relocation obligations associated
with such mobile employment.
Members who choose to purchase and occupy their own home are
assisted by the Home Purchase Assistance Scheme (HPAS) for initial
purchase.
Subsequent assistance for the home owner/ occupier is available
through the Home Purchase Sales and Expense Allowance (HPSEA)
for sale and purchase as a consequence of reposting.
Eligible members may also access either the Defence Service
Home Loan ($25,000) or the Defence HomeOwner Scheme ($80,000).
Conditions apply to each. ArFFA members can also access our
discounted $250,000 home loan. This is all good stuff and should
continue. However, apart from HPAS (fully taxed at source) and
HPSEA upon reposting (if applicable) there is no fortnightly
financial assistance available.
When comparing this to the amount of subsidised rental associated
with members occupying a Service Residence or Living-In Accommodation
and the amounts paid to those in receipt of Rental Allowance
(RA), it raises serious questions in regard to overall remuneration
equity in the ADF.
Depending on your point of view, the home owner/occupier, in
the longer term, is being short-changed and the Federation suggests
ADF management give serious thought to the introduction of fortnightly
assistance to these members.
Our solution would be to provide an allowance that would equate
to what they would have received if in a RA situation. Such
a concept is not new and has been debated many times during
housing and remuneration reviews in the past without progress.
That said, the Federation wishes to make it quite clear we are
not suggesting for one minute that existing housing entitlements
be “cashed out”.
We are simply suggesting a new category be added to the range
of choices.
The ADF Census 2003 determined 17 per cent of ADF members are
home owner/ occupiers and there would be a price tag attached
if the ADF were to accept our suggestion. On the up side, such
initiative would greatly assist the ADF with attraction and
retention, raise its profile as an employer of choice and encourage
members to enter the housing market.
And, by taking the long-term view, assisting ADF members to
be more self-reliant now could potentially stimulate the economy.
The Federation would welcome comments on our proposal prior
to taking this up further with the appropriate authorities.