. Logo of the Australian Department of Defence MinisterspacerNavyspacerArmyspacerAir ForcespacerDepartment
left margin of masthead Masthead :: NAVY News :: The official newspaper of the Royal Australian Navy NAVY Badge

Contents
Top Stories
Letters
Features
Finance
Recreation
Entertainment
Health and Fitness
Sport
About us
Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Letters

Grand parents in uniform

Over the years the body of an active uniformed person in the Defence Force deteriorates to the point where one physically needs more and more time to recuperate after strenuous exercise/activity.

When I left the Force in the early 90s after 27 years, many aches and pains subsided to the point where I now certainly enjoy a pain-free existence.

Thus the recent article indicating the raising of the military O.R. retirement age to 65 years is of concern. Sure it is difficult to maintain good, trained personnel in the services, but even if it restricts the old fogies to desk jobs, not being able to exercise the latest techniques/tactics developed is disturbing.

Also what sort of respect would be offered from younger fitter, more modern-trained personnel who have to wait longer for promotion or positions of importance?

I suggest that raising of the retirement age would have a negative effect on keeping personnel in uniform.

Also the idea of personnel (who join after July 1 02) on leaving the Force are required to continue a five-year stand-by Reserve service, is also a dream.

If personnel were enjoying their career they wouldn’t leave anyhow. Sure there will be a handful who leave for personal reasons and maybe keen to retain ties but, most will leave due to dissatisfaction and to seek a more stable lifestyle, so a five-year retention commitment is not attractive.

Society needs alert, active and fit young personnel to maintain progress, not old ‘fuddy-duddies’ set in their ways and unapproachable to change.

It’s about time Defence sought a more ‘man-on-the-ground’ opinion and not develop process/ideas based on what an outside consultant can dream up.

Happy trails.

Dee Hebden (ex WO1 - Army)
POPABX - DCC

Moving experience with DHA

In recent times Defence Housing Authority (DHA) has come in for a bit of flak.

I have very recently gone through the DHA process of finding a house and conducting a removal. My experience can only be described as excellent.

Staff have all been great and the processes were completed very quickly and efficiently.

Particular thanks must go to the Fleet Liaison Officer, Cathy Thompson. She is doing a superb job and I would like to publicly sing her praises.

Bravo Zulu.

CMDR Andrew Rourke,
HQAST.

Searching for...

WO Cliff Clancy,
PO Rob Taylor and CPO Tommy Charnock


I am a retired Warrant Officer Master at Arms — Royal Navy and am keen to make contact with the following persons:

Cliff Clancy Warrant Officer (RAN Police) and Petty Officer Rob Taylor (stores).

We last met in Singapore in 1990-91 whilst I was serving on HMS Invincible.

Tommy Charnock, Chief Petty Officer WEA, ex Royal Navy — he transferred to the RAN after we served together in HMS Edinburgh.

I would be eternally grateful if my email address could be passed through the medium of Navy News, in the hope that I might re-establish contact with some very great friends and fellow sailors.

Yours in anticipation,

Lew Jack
LwJack3@aol.com

Benjamin Warlow

I am trying to trace my cousin Benjamin Warlow (possibly in his 60’s) and while surfing the net, came across Navy News.

My cousin is the son of my Uncle Benny Warlow who died in a Japanese POW camp in 1945 and is buried at Seram in the Moluccan Islands.

Uncle Benjamin Warlow RN, was married to Nora and lived at 15 Weston Mill Road, St. Budeaux, Plymouth. I think they maybe his parents.

I was wondering whether the reference to LCDR Benjamin Warlow, a writer, could be the cousin I am searching for.
Any information I can obtain would greatly assist me in my search and would be very much appreciated.

Thank you.

Barbara Shelley (nee Warlow)
b.j.shelley@btopenworld.com


The opinions expressed in letters to the editor do not represent the views of the editor or the Navy. Sailors wishing to air their views through letters to the editor have access to the newspaper without using the chain of command. Letters may be edited. Preference will be given to letters of fewer than 300 words. The letter will be published only when it includes the author’s name, unit (where applicable), location and contact number. If the author has a genuine reason for remaining anonymous, he or she must still provide details to allow Navy Newspaper staff members to discuss the matter. Send your letters to:
The Editor — Navy Newspaper
R8-LG-039

Department of Defence, Canberra 2600; or email to:
navynews@defencenews.gov.au

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top Stories | Letters | Features | Finance | Computing | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us