. Logo of the Australian Department of Defence MinisterspacerNavyspacerArmyspacerAir ForcespacerDepartment
left margin of masthead Masthead :: NAVY News :: The official newspaper of the Royal Australian Navy NAVY Badge

Contents
Top Stories
Letters
Features
Finance
Recreation
Entertainment
Health and Fitness
Sport
About us
Home
Navigation Bar End

 

 

Letters

Compulsory fitness training — how about it Navy?

Re ‘Navy losing battle of the bulge’ (letters, Sept 26):

You would not be surprised by the findings of Helen Carter, looking around the workplace, on any base or fleet unit.

The Navy has a few problems, one being the sub-standard fitness test and the frequency that it is held. The second is the threat of not being promoted if a fitness test is failed.

While there is a threat the actual reality of it being carried out is nil.

POATV William McConnell
CI Det, 817 Squadron.


The letter by LEUT James Crosby (September 26) on how naval personnel fitness standards are at an all time unhealthy level mentioned Army standards.

A suggestion was that maybe we should be looking at how they achieve their high levels.
I worked at the Army’s aviation base in Queensland for 12 months and I can easily tell you how they achieve these results.

Physical training (PT) and all other aspects of sport are compulsory activity and everyone is encouraged to participate.

We had one hour of morning PT twice a week and afternoon PT once. There was also Wednesday afternoon departmental and representative sport.

A survey by the gymnasium showed that more than 50 per cent of personnel did no form of exercise outside of work hours.

I am sorry James, but as long as our commanding officers feel that a sailor’s body fat percentage does not affect his work performance, and attendance at sport and PT during working hours as a burden on their resources, the Navy’s levels of physical health will always be of a lower standard than the Army.

Nick Sverdloff,
Ex-CPOATV, Brisbane.

In reply to LEUT James Crosby about Naval personnel being obese and not at the same fitness level as the Army (letters Sept 26), maybe the Navy should introduce compulsory fitness training during working hours as the Army does.

Thirty minutes of sport every Tuesday and Thursday morning does not constitute fitness training. For a start it is not compulsory.

Personnel would be more inclined to participate in fitness training if it was conducted in Navy time and not their own.

I understand that people have an obligation to maintain a certain standard of personal fitness, but by having time specifically allocated for fitness training I think the Navy would see a remarkable improvement in fitness levels/BMI (Body Mass Index) and also in teamwork.


LS Paul Savage,
HMAS Cairns.

 

Top of side bar

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top Stories | Letters | Features | Finance | Computing | Entertainment | Health & Fitness | Sport | About us