Media Room: Defence Transcripts
Department of Defence
Transcripts |
Defence |
| 08/04/2009 | MECC 90408/09 |
|
THE CHIEF OF
NAVY, VICE ADMIRAL RUSS CRANE AM CSM, RAN,
MEDIA CONFERENCE REGARDING NAVY’S SUBMARINE WORKFORCE SUSTAINABILITY
PROGRAM Wednesday, 8
April 2009 E&OE VICE ADMIRAL RUSS CRANE: Well,
good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you very much for your time
today. I'd like to brief you on some major changes to the way we're managing
one of Australia's most important assets, our submarines. You
all know Australia's maritime force is facing - Australia's submarine force is
facing significant challenges. Rest assured they remain a very capable force
and I am extremely proud of the service and capability that our submarines
provide. But I
am concerned that their long-term sustainability cannot be guaranteed unless we
act decisively. The challenges facing navy submarine force today may well be
felt by the wider navy in years to come unless we put our people first. Navy
is sometimes accused of ignoring our submariners. But while they make up about
five per cent of our total workforce, they require a substantial percentage of
Navy's total budget and deliver a very substantial element of our fighting
capability. So we owe it to them to get this right. Today,
I am announcing significant and widespread reforms to the way Australia's
submarine force is structured and the way in which it operates. Navy
is implementing a submarine sustainability program which will do four things;
it will stem the number of qualified submariners leaving the submarine force by
improving their working conditions. It will speed up the training process to
get new submariners fully qualified and to see faster. It
will increase the number of new submariners through an aggressive external and
internal recruitment program and change the prevailing mission focus submarine
culture so that there is a greater focus on the wellbeing of submariners and of
their families. The
overall goal is to grow the submarine workforce to enable a fourth,
sustainable, seagoing crew to be formed by the end of 2011. To achieve this,
we're spearheading a five-pronged process, the first of which has already been
completed. Phase one which occurred in 2008 is an analysis phase. This
phase included the conduct of the submarine sustainability review and other
surveys to understand the problem, followed by implementation of initial
actions and some quick wins. Phase two is a stabilisation phase and will run
from 2009 to 2011. This phase will achieve three sustainable crews of 58
personnel, up from 46 currently; assisted by a submarine support group of 27
people to provide high priority technical and administrative support services
to our crews when they're alongside. Phase
three, which is a recovery phase, will run concurrently from 2011 through to
2012. This phase will achieve a fourth sustainable crew of 58 personnel to
consistently meet submarine readiness requirements, a fully manned and
sustainable submarine support group providing a broad range of support services
to crews and sustain manning of the submarine shore positions. Phase
four, which is a consolidation phase, will operate from 2012 through to 2015.
Now this phase will include evaluating alternate crewing arrangements, three
crews to perhaps two platforms, as was recommended in the review. By
evaluating the need for more crews, depending on the effectiveness of the new
construct of four sustainable crews backed up by a fully resourced submarine
support group. Phase five, which is a growth phase, will occur from 2015
onwards. Now
this phase will implement workforce expansion plans, to meet strategic guidance
and lay the foundations for the transition from the Collins Class submarines to
our future submarines under C1000. Last
year, Navy commissioned several studies; the most significant was handed to me
in November. Rear Admiral Rowan Moffitt's submarine workforce sustainability
review pulls no punches. And I invite you, navy members and the Australian
public, to read it. Most
of the report is now being made available to you and is up on the Navy website
at navy.gov.au. Since
November, we've been working hard on stabilising the submarine workforce. As
I've made clear, this phase will achieve those three sustainable crews of 58
personnel each and to support them with a submarine support group of 27 people
to provide that high-priority technical and administrative support to our crews
at sea and alongside. By
2011, my aim is for our submarine force to have recovered enough to be able to
sustain that fourth crew. From 2012 we will consolidate by evaluating what we
will have achieved so far and thoroughly examining options for alternate
crewing strategies. Now this might involve a form of multi-crewing. We've
already taken the first step in this area by separating our crews from hulls. The
most critical element of any warship is its crew. And we've now taken an
approach in the submarine group which aims to focus on the crew and rotate
crews to submarines rather than the other way round. That's not unlike the
approach taken in the airline industry or indeed in the offshore industry. Now,
I should point out that our efforts to improve Navy submarine force are already
beginning to show some results. There has been a small increase in our
retention rates for submarines. That's an encouraging sign, but we still have a
lot of hard work to do. But
we have already had some success. Actions now underway include improved shore
accommodation standards for submarine crews when their submarine is alongside,
away from home port, fewer submariners will be required to keep watch in port,
giving them additional rests and respite, a 25 per cent increase in submarine
crew size in order to ease the workload on sea-going crew members to enable
more sustainable work routines both at sea and alongside, internet and intranet
access is being provided to our submariners, the number of shore-based postings
for our submariners is being increased, ensuring posting stability for our
people in the west, an establishment of a new submarine support group, as I've
mentioned, to take over some of the workload from our crew members. Australia's
submarine force remains critical in the defence of this nation. Let me repeat,
if we are called upon today, our submariners are well able to meet any
challenge. But we can't afford to burn out our people. I will not allow it and
neither will the Australian people. The
time has come for strong action to safeguard Australia's submarine force now
and into the future. I'm now happy to take any questions that you might have. QUESTION: Admiral, Mark Dodd from The
Australian newspaper. How was it that things were able to get so bad in the
submariner force and who takes responsibility? RUSS CRANE: I think if you read the Moffitt Report which is being made
available to you today, you will see that the pace of life and operational
commitment in our Submarine Force Element Group has been perhaps the single
most difficult contributor to this particular problem. My takeaway from the
report and from the recommendations that have been put to me is that we need to
take some of that pressure off our submariners. I think that is the key issue.
Our submariners have told us that. We now need to fix it. This plan will do
that. QUESTION: Max Lincoln (*) from AAP, Admiral. What do you define as a
sustainable crew? RUSS CRANE: A sustainable crew is one that we can continue to plan for
over many, many years, one that we can rotate people through, that we have the
infrastructure and the people elsewhere to be able to rotate people through a
crew consistently. So it's not a one shot. It's one that is able to be
replaced, as people move through their submarine career. QUESTION: So that's as people move through - there's enough people in
training and there's enough people available to fill gaps while on leave, that
sort of thing? RUSS CRANE: That's correct. If you have people at sea for a period of
time, you need a sustainable resource behind them to be able to replace them
and not leave them at sea for too long. Typically, we would look for 18 months
to two years before it's time to bring people ashore and give them a break.
Sustainable crews is all about having our ability to be able to do that. QUESTION: Ian McPhedran from News Limited. This report paints a pretty
terrible picture of mismanagement. What guarantees can you give to the
Australian people that your plan for the future will work and what will you do
if that plan doesn't work? RUSS CRANE: I think the report, as I said, is very hard-hitting. It
doesn't pull any punches. It tells the picture as it is. I take confidence in
that that is a realistic assessment of the submarine group by the submariners
themselves. They're the people we really need to listen to. And
so I have great confidence that what we're doing addresses the issues that they
have raised with us. We've focused very much on their particular issues, and I
have great confidence we can do that. In
terms of reporting, I am required to report to the Minister on a quarterly
basis, so I'm very comfortable that there will be an ongoing tracking process
to ensure that we continue to deliver. QUESTION: Nick Butterly from The West
Australian. Can you explain how many boats you can have and how many
submarines you can operate at the moment - or you are operating at the moment
sustainably? And also can you explain a bit about - the fortunes of the mining
industry in WA have always played a large role in being able to find crew for
submarines. Do you think that is now going to turn around, given that the
mining industry has suffered something of a slump? RUSS CRANE: Certainly, the - if I could take the second part of the
question first. Certainly, the movement and the increase in the numbers of
people moving into the mining industry, particularly in Western Australia, in
the past have been a factor in the separation rates from our submarine group.
But I would have to say that I think that's only part of the issue. The fact
that people felt that they needed to leave the submarine group to go off into
another industry is something that we need to pay attention to. In terms of the first part of the
question, it's well known that I've got three crews available at the moment,
and I can man the submarines that I have available to me to provide to the CDF
the capability that I'm directed to provide so we can meet our requirements
today, and we will continue to meet them as we build the submarine force into,
into the future. QUESTION: John Kerin from the Fin
Review. In terms of recruiting new people, are you looking at, within navy
overseas, or Gen Y? I mean, is it a mix of all three? What's the thrust of that
going to be? RUSS CRANE: Initially the thrust in the recruiting area will be
internally. I've
recently implemented an internal recruitment program which sees us take the top
10 recruits from every recruit intake that we have, across to Western
Australia, and provide them with an opportunity to participate in the initial
part of submarine familiarisation. It's
very early days. But, in the first course it looks like eight out of 10 have
elected to follow a submarine career path. So,
internally I think is where we will, we will focus very much in the near
future. But we do look for lateral recruits. We have an active campaign looking
for lateral recruits; and we are very keen to bring people in directly from the
external recruiting program as well. QUESTION: Admiral, Latika Bourke from 2UE. Just,
I'm wondering, you said earlier that you wanted to stem the number of mariners,
submariners leaving by improving their working conditions. What improvements do
you hope to make, and by when? RUSS CRANE: Well, as I, as I've tried to outline; I think increasing
the crew size from 46 to 58 - and bear in mind that this does not mean that
there will be 58 submariners at sea in every submarine - it means that the
commanding officer will have available to him, for his submarine, an increased
crew. So he
is able to rotate his people, as he comes alongside, give them an opportunity
to go off and do professional development courses, personal development
training, take some leave perhaps. We
also have the submarine support group available to augment, where required, for
those types of activities. It's
that quality of life, looking after the individual, that we're particularly
focused on. QUESTION: Admiral, Max… RUSS CRANE: [Inaudible question] QUESTION: …what the likely budget impact of these reforms, these changes?
Have you an estimate? RUSS CRANE: We're still working the detail of the financial requirement
in order to implement the plan; bearing in mind that this is a, quite a
long-term plan; about six, six years before we get out to 2015. But
our initial look would suggest to us that it's not a big number. For instance,
in the case of HMAS Farncomb, we have
already increased the size of that crew, and we've done that through an
internal reprioritisation of submarine billets. So that's been done from our,
internally from navy itself. And
that's where we'd be looking. QUESTION: Sorry, Nick Butterly from The
West Australian, again. Just
on another topic - a boat load of asylum seekers managed to make it all the way
to dock into Christmas Island last night at four o'clock in the morning. Can
you explain to us what you know about this? There's
also been a recent, apparent surge of boats detected recently. What's your intelligence
as to why this is happening at the moment, and was this a failure of security
for, to allow a boat to come all the way into Christmas Island? RUSS CRANE: Can I say I am certainly aware of the arrival of that boat
at Christmas Island this morning. I
think one of the key issues for me is that those 45 people onboard are safe and
well and are now in the hands of the Customs and Immigration Department on
Christmas Island; and being processed. The
operation of the border protection is, is a function of the border protection
command - something which sits outside navy. So I
think it's probably more appropriate that I leave any further detail in
relation to that incident to them. QUESTION: Was the navy aware of the existence of this ship before it docked
though? RUSS CRANE: I'm not sure whether border protection command was aware or
not. I am saying that I'm aware, have been made aware of the arrival. It's
an issue that the border protection command would work. QUESTION: Max… RUSS CRANE: Is this the last question? UNIDENTIFIED: Fit two in, maybe. RUSS CRANE: Okay. QUESTION: Hi. Jonathan Pearlman from The
Sydney Morning Herald. Just
in the target date for that fourth crew of end of 2011. It still seems like
quite a long time. Why will it take so long to fill out another crew? RUSS CRANE: Two things, I think that are important here. In setting
target dates for something as critical as our submarine force, we need to be
careful not to put in place deliverables that we can't meet. We need to do this
in a sustainable way. So
I'm after a very measured approach, and something that we can really achieve. That's
because training submariners is not an easy task. Firstly they have to be
trained in their particular category. And then of course they've got to go off
and get their dolphin qualifications. It doesn't happen overnight. It
takes time to generate submariners. It takes time to generate that experience.
So I want to be careful in announcing this plan, that we do something that we
can achieve and achieve consistently. QUESTION: Admiral, Max Blenkin back again. How
many submariners would you like to pick up from the Brits or the Canadians, and
do you have any indication of their response? I know how they'd, how we'd
respond if they set up a recruiting stall outside Fleet Base West. RUSS CRANE: We, we certainly advertise overseas for submariners, or
indeed any other naval people that might be interested in transferring to our
navy. It's
not something I hide. It's a discussion that I have with chiefs of navy from
other nations. I'd have to say that it's generally a very positive response. We
don't actively recruit outside establishments. That's not the way we do
business. But if people are interested in transferring to the Royal Australian
Navy, then there's an opportunity for them to do that. QUESTION: …the earlier issue about the asylum seekers - I
understand what you're saying about they're a Customs issue, but, what does it
say about, from a defence point of view, that this boat could arrive undetected
right to the Island? RUSS CRANE: Well I think you, you need to perhaps understand the, the
concept and the way in which the border protection command executes its
surveillance and response mission. But
is - this is a matter for the border protection command, not for navy. So I
really should leave any further comment to them. Okay.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very very much for your time. I appreciate it. Media contact: Defence Media Liaison: 02 6265
3343 or 0408 498 664 |
|
Issued
by Ministerial and Executive Coordination and Communication, [ back to top ] |
|
