Media Room: Media Releases
|
Defence |
| 28/05/2009 | MSPA 176/09 |
|
|
|
|
RELEASE OF
INQUIRY OFFICER REPORT INTO CIVILIAN CASUALTY CLAIMS ON JANUARY 5 The
Australian Defence Force (ADF) investigation into alleged civilian casualty
claims against Australian Defence Force soldiers during operations in the
Baluchi Pass area of southern Afghanistan in early January has found there was
no evidence to support a finding that the ADF caused civilian casualties. Evidence
gathered during the inquiry found that shrapnel taken from an Afghan who
claimed to have been injured by ADF forces did not match the metal used in
Australian mortar shells. The
Chief of the Defence Force, Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston, today released the
Inquiry Officer’s report into the operational circumstances surrounding the events
of the 5th of January. Air
Chief Marshal Angus Houston said the report found that the Special Operations
Task Group (SOTG) force element was targeting Taliban insurgents when they came
under attack. “Taliban
insurgents were moving around the SOTG position and engaging them from multiple
directions and locations,” Air Chief Marshal Houston said. “Throughout
the morning, the soldiers returned fire using small arms, mortars and a missile
from a supporting aircraft in order to defend themselves. It was a complex
event where the soldiers were under fire in a hostile environment, operating in
four locations and using four communications systems. “In
the course of the battle, the Taliban also fired a rocket propelled grenade and
a 107mm rocket which exploded in the air and to the rear of the Australian
soldiers, in an area where Afghan civilians were seen earlier that morning.” Air
Chief Marshal Houston said on the 5th of January at approximately
1.30pm, the time when eight Afghans presented themselves to the coalition
forward operating base for medical treatment, the SOTG had employed seven fire
missions to engage the hostile insurgents. “All
of these missions were fired at identified targets and were in accordance with
Australian and ISAF targeting procedures. All but one of the mortar missions
were fully observed by a SOTG member and no civilian casualties were evident,”
ACM Houston said. “The Inquiry Officer did find that there was
one fire mission that was not observed, due to a limited field of view offered
by an unmanned aerial vehicle. “While
the target was deemed legitimate, the process for observation of fire missions
was not adhered to. However, it was determined that there was an intent to
observe the mission and that there was no need for further action to be
pursued.” Air
Chief Marshal Houston said the Inquiry Officer recommended a number of areas
for improvement, including the clarification of the terminology used to order a
fire mission and a review of current and future force structures which include
mortar assets to ensure there are sufficient qualified observers to use them
more effectively in combat. “But
we must understand that despite these areas for improvement, the actions of the
SOTG soldiers were commendable in the circumstances; they were under attack
from a determined enemy and were using discretion in applying direct and
indirect fire to identified targets,” Air Chief Marshal Houston said “The
battles that the Afghan, coalition and Australian forces continue to face in Media contact: Defence Media Liaison:
02 6265 3343 or 0408 498 664 |
|
Issued
by Ministerial Support and Public Affairs,
Department of Defence,
[ back to top ] |
|
