House of Representatives Notice Paper Question No 130
Schedule Number: 74884 |
Publication Date: 8 February 2005
Hansard: Pages 151-2 |
Defence: Medical Board of Inquiry |
Member: Price |
Mr Price asked the Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 17 November 2004:
- Further to the answer to question No. 1675 (Hansard, 11 August 2003, page 18079), was a substituted Notice of Inquiry (No. 2) dated 9 January 2003 the final notice issued by the WA Medical Board of Inquiry.
- Now that the WA Medical Board of Inquiry has made its findings, what were the particulars considered by the Board and what were the findings.
- Did the Minister, the Australian Defence Force or the Department of Defence seek from Dr McKenzie details of the particulars of the notice issued to Dr McKenzie; if so, when and when were they provided.
- If the particulars were not provided, what were the guidelines and criteria used to determine whether or not the Department of Defence would meet Dr McKenzie's legal costs.
Mrs Kelly - The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:
- No.
- This information comprises approximately 13 pages and is contained in the Reasons for Decision published by the Board for case No.1501-7 on 20 July 2004, available from the Board.
- No.
- The Legal Services Directions made by the Attorney-General in accordance with section 55 ZF Judiciary Act 1903.
close