ADF Health September 2004 - Volume 5 Number 2Medicine at seaMorbidity and mortality on RAN ships
MEDICAL SUPPORT AT SEA for Royal Australian Navy (RAN) operations is provided by ships' medical teams of varied competencies and strengths. These teams range from a solo medical sailor with the support of a Ship's Medical Emergency Team to a fully equipped Surgical Support Team of surgeons, anaesthetists, intensive care physicians, theatre nurses and medical sailors, as in the Primary Casualty Receiving Facility of the RAN's two heavy landing ships. Commonly, a frigate or destroyer will be provided with a ship's medical officer when deploying overseas; at least, there will be one medical officer within a task group. The ship's medical officer usually has limited experience in surgery and anaesthesia, and occasionally may be faced with an acute surgical emergency in mid-ocean, with expert surgical help thousands of kilometres away. Even if the officer has the confidence and ability to perform emergency surgery, there is often no skilled anaesthetic support nearby. Evacuation by helicopter from the ship is only possible if the ship is within flying range of the aircraft (usually about 400 nautical miles). Submarines and smaller surface ships lacking a landing facility for helicopters pose an additional set of logistical problems for medical retrieval. The fitness of sailors at sea is assured by high predeployment standards of health (including a requirement that female sailors are not pregnant), but such checks cannot prevent unforeseen accidents and unpredictable acute surgical emergencies from arising at sea. These include complications of early pregnancy and a range of gynaecological emergencies. Acute medical and surgical emergencies requiring prompt medical care for sailors of both sexes include appendicitis, cholecystitis, peptic ulceration and haematemesis, pneumothorax, asthma, severe sea sickness, decompression sickness, marine envenomation, fractures, and intracranial haemorrhage after head injury. Male sailors are at risk of testicular torsion and acute epididymo-orchitis. Because diagnostic facilities are limited in fleet units, maximum use of basic clinical skills is required. Diagnosis of the condition may at best be narrowed to a shortlist of possibilities. As a general principle, surgical procedures at sea in units not equipped with operating theatres should only be undertaken as a last resort. The level of surgical and medical emergencies at sea in RAN ships is not well recorded. This is important information for health planners to provide adequate support for sailors at sea, including allocation of appropriately trained ships' medical officers. This study aimed to determine the level of morbidity and mortality in seagoing sailors in RAN ships and compare this with data from other navies. MethodsAll available 6-monthly medical journals for RAN ships were obtained from Maritime Headquarters. These included records from 14 major fleet units spanning 124 periods, mostly of 6 months' duration, between 1991 and 2003. The crew complement and record of sea time were obtained from each period to derive a figure for "man sea days" (acknowledging that up to 20% of some crews were female). Form PM293 is a statistical form that is part of the ship's medical journal kept by all major fleet units. It is completed for every 6-month period and details levels of crew morbidity, vaccinations performed, public health education provided by sick-bay staff, a record of drugs of addiction used and health inspections conducted. Minor fleet units, such as patrol boats, minehunters, landing craft and submarines, are not required to collect such data.
The level of morbidity during each 6-month period was determined from the four categories recorded on Form PM293, including crew members admitted to the sick-list aboard, those admitted to naval hospitals, those landed ashore sick, and those admitted to non-naval hospitals. Specific data on serious morbidity were extracted from the ships' medical journals where these were available. Data on all medical evacuations undertaken were also obtained from PM293 forms and from a medical evacuation database held by Headquarters Australian Theatre and covering 13 deployments to the Persian Gulf from July 2001 to February 2003. It was not possible to separate episodes of morbidity that occurred at sea from those occurring alongside. However, the ships' activity levels were available, and these allowed some comparison of morbidity rates to be made, morbidity rates in times of low seagoing activity such as refits were compared with morbidity rates in times of high operational activity such as Persian Gulf deployments (Operation Slipper, Operation Damask). The latter involved minimal periods alongside. In addition, the log of all communications between major and minor fleet units and the Deputy Fleet Medical Officer over an 18-month period was analysed to determine the spectrum of medical and surgical emergencies occurring at sea from August 1999 to November 2000. Statistical analysis included the Pearson correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U test. ResultsAnalysis of medical journalsA total of 1 797 631 man sea days were available for study. This represented data from a total of 134 data sheets on 14 RAN ships. These ships included two guided missile destroyers (HMAS Brisbane, Perth) with crew complements of about 330, two heavy amphibious landing ships (HMAS Kanimbla, Manoora) with crew complements of 250-350, six FFG frigates (HMAS Adelaide, Canberra, Darwin, Melbourne, Newcastle, Sydney) with crew complements of about 200, two supply ships (HMAS Success, Westralia) with crews of about 230 and 100, respectively, and two Anzac class frigates (HMAS Anzac, Arunta) with crews of about 175 sailors. In a 6-month period, the number of sea days ranged from zero (6-month refit) to 151 (median, 120 days; mean, 69.5 days). The number of man sea days for a 6- month period ranged from zero to 30 240 (mean, 13 318; median, 26 400). The rate of morbidity (total sick) ranged from zero to 18 per 10 000 man sea days (median, 16 per 10 000 man sea days; mean, 15 per 10 000 man sea days). The rate of acute surgical emergencies was 1 per 40 000 man sea days, and the rate of acute medical emergencies was 1 per 18 000 man sea days. This gives a combined rate of acute emergencies of 1 per 12 400 man sea days. There was poor correlation between the number of total sick per 6 months and the number of man sea days (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.271).
For the 14 ships, there were 65 medical evacuations recorded, spanning some 54 ship sea years, or about 1.2 evacuations per sea year for the whole study group. The rate of morbidity at sea during Persian Gulf deployments (21 separate deployments in nine ships) was not significantly different from morbidity rates during refits (Box 1): the mean morbidity rate for Gulf deployments was 0.54 per 1000 man sea days (95% CI, 0.11-0.98 per 1000 man sea days) compared with 0.52 per 1000 man refit days (95% CI, 0.23-0.82 per 1000 man refit days; P = 0.06). The rates of specific illnesses are summarised in Box 2. These include four members with smoke inhalation, all of whom died on HMAS Westralia in 1998. Analysis of communication logsIn an alternative attempt to determine the frequency of certain illnesses on RAN vessels at sea, the telephone log of the RAN Deputy Fleet Medical Officer was analysed. This comprised 44 communications over 15 months (Box 3). Fifteen of these calls concerned casualties beyond the Australian coastline. Eighteen of the 44 calls concerned casualties in minor fleet units. Twenty-one of the casualties required medical evacuation. A ship's medical officer made 14 of the 44 calls. Of the remaining 30 calls, medics made nine, petty officer coxswains (responsible for basic medical care in minor fleet units) made 11, and officers and other ranks made 10.
Nine of the 44 calls related to orthopaedic injuries and two involved psychiatric illness. The acute obstetric case related to an unauthorised boat arrival (UBA) on Ashmore Reef. The woman, who had a history of three previous caesarean sections, was transferred in suspected labour to a patrol boat. In addition, a petty officer coxswain saw another UBA immigrant at 24 weeks' gestation with headaches. Another UBA presented to the crew of a patrol boat with a secondary postpartum haemorrhage. She was treated conservatively with antibiotics after communication between a ship's medical officer on the patrol boat and a gynaecologist. There were two consultations regarding severe seasickness in the period August 1999 to November 2000. DiscussionMorbidity and mortality at sea in the period 1991 to 2003 were low, with only four fatalities (in a single accident). There was no significant difference in the morbidity rates between ships involved in high operational activity (Gulf deployments). The deaths of four sailors on board HMAS Westralia in an engine room fire accounted for the only seagoing deaths for the whole study period. In 1998, the mortality in the RAN was 4 per 10 000 members per year. This compares with 10 per 10 000 members in the Army in 1998 and 4 per 10 000 members in the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). Between 1994 and 1998, accidents represented 66% of all RAN deaths, 71% of Army deaths and 48% of RAAF deaths. The overall mortality in the Australian Defence Force was 6-7 per 10 000 members, of whom 32% died from natural causes, 27% from motor vehicle accidents and 17% from suicide. 1 While the traditional concept of the ship's medical officer is that of a person capable of performing emergency surgery, such as appendicectomy, at sea, the necessity to do so is minimal (eg, only seven cases of appendicitis and two cases of peptic ulcer were reported by the 14 ships over the study period, spanning nearly 55 years of accumulated sea time). The commonest option was to evacuate acute emergency patients (21/44 cases in the Deputy Fleet Medical Officer's log) and clearly the availability of shipborne helicopters has meant that most casualties can be transferred either to a shore-based facility or to a capital ship with better medical facilities.
The RAN has chosen to evacuate people with acute surgical and medical conditions from seagoing ships wherever possible. Other navies have chosen to operate on relatively large numbers of sailors at sea (eg, the Soviet whaling fleet based in Antarctic waters operated on 1800 personnel, including more than 200 women, over a 12-year period). 2 Like their merchant marine counterpart, the Soviet Navy also chose to treat sailors at sea surgically, reporting 1000 such operations, including 205 appendicectomies. These operations were occasionally performed under ether/oxygen anaesthesia in frontline surface ships, but in submarines local anaesthesia, especially using a novocaine right perinephric block, was preferred. 3 Apart from appendicectomies, perforated ulcers, abdominal cavity trauma and injuries to extremities were all treated at sea by the Soviet Navy. 4 The US Navy performed 684 operations aboard ships of the Atlantic Fleet over a 3-year period from 1994 to 1996, reporting surgical morbidity rates far lower than those of a shore-based navy surgical facility. 5 The series included 84 appendicectomies, 150 inguinal herniorrhaphies and 171 vasectomies. More recent publications describe laparoscopic hernia repairs aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln in the Pacific Ocean, 6 and using intercontinental telemonitoring systems to link consulting surgeons in Maryland and California to the ship's operating theatres (Battlegroup Telemedicine). 7 The Royal Navy has followed a more conservative path, although surgery at sea on aircraft carriers such as HMS Ark Royal was practised, particularly to keep the medical department at maximum efficiency. 8 For Royal Navy submarines, the treatment of acute surgical conditions is necessarily conservative - in 100 Polaris patrols of average duration of 50 days, 20 submariners with appendicitis were treated surgically, with only one requiring emergency medical evacuation (because of portal pyaemia). 9 One hundred and six surgical emergencies were described in that article, giving a rate of one surgical patient per 7944 man sea days. This figure is similar to estimates made in a study of US submarines. 10 It suggests that one surgical emergency can be expected on an average patrol of 8500 man sea days. Our data suggest that the rate of acute medical emergencies in the RAN is slightly better than in the Polaris patrols. In real terms, it would mean that a 6- month deployment to the Persian Gulf could involve one to two acute medical or surgical emergencies, depending on the crew numbers. However, it should be emphasised that the data extracted from PM293 forms were suspected of being incomplete in a significant number of cases. Revision of the data collection form is strongly recommended.
A study in the US Navy of 354 surface ships, 42 Pacific Fleet submarines and 54 military transport ships reported that, in 62% of cases where a medical communication was made, the patient was subsequently evacuated from the ship. 11 Twenty-eight per cent of these medical evacuations were deemed avoidable if a system of sophisticated telemedicine had been available. This would include transmission of radiographs, imaging studies, and voice communication between sickbay staff and shore-based facilities. In 22% of these evacuations, the shipboard diagnosis was significantly different from the final diagnosis (eg, "fracture" versus contusion, "appendicitis" versus gastrointestinal upset). Overall, it was estimated that the average US Navy ship initiates two medical evacuations per year. The rate of evacuations from ships whose medical departments were staffed only by an independent duty corpsman was more than double that of ships staffed by a physician (3.5 per 1000 patient visits versus 1.5 per 1000 patient visits). This was thought to be a problem resulting from poorer diagnoses by independent duty corpsmen. The solution proposed was to introduce clinical algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of common acute conditions, such as appendicitis and infectious diseases. These were subsequently developed. 12 The high rate of RAN medical evacuations described in the Deputy Fleet Medical Officer's log (48% of 44 cases) may reflect the fact that 40% of calls were from minor fleet units lacking a medical officer. Although the data may be incomplete, the low number of medical evacuations reported in the 14 major fleet units in our study (65 evacuations over 54 ship sea years) agrees with findings reported by Mark and Hodge when describing advice given by radio to masters of merchant ships in the Southern and Indian oceans: 13 48 patients with spontaneous illness were discussed (7 surgical, 41 medical), including 27 injuries at sea. In only 12% of cases was there a need for the ship to change course significantly - most illnesses were diagnosed and treated on board. However, the paramedical qualifications of the merchant seaman making the call may be less than those of RAN-trained medics, who might be expected to seek advice about simple conditions less frequently than their merchant service colleagues. Pregnancy emergencies are uncommon in servicewomen at sea. However, the involvement of major and minor fleet units in the apprehension and transportation of UBAs since August 2001 has required RAN ships to deal with pregnancy complications (including hyperemesis, confinement and postpartum haemorrhage) arising in civilians at sea. The transport of UBAs and contact with new strains of microorganisms have led to an increase in communicable diseases in RAN crews (eg, an epidemic of adenovirus conjunctivitis). The rate of appendicitis is 26.3 per 10 000 men aged 15-24 years per annum in the Australian population, 14 and, in 1998, in the RAAF was 24 per 10 000 per annum). 1 Therefore, in our sample of a seagoing population of 3140 sailors in 14 ships, one might expect up to eight cases of appendicitis per year. Peptic ulcers could also be expected to occur in greater numbers, with rates in the Australian population aged 15-24 years of 39.8 per 10 000 per annum for women and 17.7 per 10 000 per annum for men. The rates for peptic ulcer escalate in the 25-34 years age group: 82.2 per 10 000 per annum for women and 66.0 per 10 000 per annum for men. 14 One might therefore have expected to see 20 or more cases in our study instead of only two. In the RAAF, gastrointestinal tract endoscopies were the second commonest operative procedure in 1998 (1.4 per 10 000 members per annum). 1 Hospital admission rates for digestive system diseases rank first in the Australian population generally (3.5 per 10 000 population per annum) and in the RAN (4.31 per 10 000 members per annum). 1
Mental disorders occur in the general Australian population at a rate of 106 per 10 000 per annum. 14 There were 19 cases of psychiatric illness detected in sailors on RAN ships in this study, giving a rate of 0.1 per 10 000 man sea days, or 1 per 259 man sea years. One might have expected 33 cases for our 3140 sailors. The overall rate for mental disorders in the RAN in 1998-99 was 180 per 10 000 per annum (1 per 55 sailors and substantially higher than the overall Australian incidence), compared with 69 per 10 000 per annum for the Army and 72 per 10 000 per annum for RAAF personnel. 1 Part of the unusually high incidence in the RAN is due to the impracticality of treating people with such illnesses as outpatients, so many are admitted to RAN hospitals for more intensive treatment ashore. In civilian life, many patients would never be admitted because of the ready availability of outpatient care by psychiatrists. At sea, the treatment of subacute mental illness may well be deferred until the ship is again alongside for longer periods, such as during refits. The rate of acute trauma was 0.2 per 10 000 man sea days. It is important to note that ship maintenance ranks 11th in the top 15 causes of workplace injuries to ADF members, 1 and in 1998 accounted for 111 casualties in the RAN. The rates of disease aboard Navy ships in peace time have been recognised as higher than those in time of war. 15 For example, the rate of illness aboard Royal Navy aircraft carriers during the Second World War was 9.55 per 10 000 man days (compared with 11.44 per 10 000 man days in peacetime), and was progressively higher in smaller ships such as cruisers (10.81 per 10 000 man days in wartime; 15.71 per 10 000 man days in peacetime). There was a similar finding in the Vietnam War. 16 The wartime figures for smaller Royal Navy ships are higher than our own figure of 6.92 per 10 000 man sea days for RAN ships involved in Persian Gulf deployments. One explanation given for these lower rates in combat and in larger ships is the reduced time spent in port. 15 Presumably this led to reduced exposure to infectious diseases. One epidemic of gastroenteritis recorded in the ship's medical journal of an RAN guided missile frigate involved 34 sailors. It was traced back to a single source, who acquired the infection in a navy townhouse development ashore. Another recent factor that may increase morbidity rates at sea has been the introduction of female crew, who appear to have higher rates of illness. Several studies have described the much greater use of ships' medical departments by female sailors in the Royal Navy and the US Navy - threefold greater and ninefold greater, respectively. 17,18 The implication of this finding for the staffing of a ship's medical department could be significant: it has been calculated that replacing just 10% of a ship's all-male crew with female sailors would lead to a doubling in the medical workload. 17
ConclusionWe have reviewed the morbidity and mortality rates in an unselected sample of major RAN fleet units. The actual rates of medical evacuation appear to compare more than favourably with those of other navies, and the rate of morbidity for many conditions at sea seems lower than might be expected from both Australian population and ADF data. This may be due, in part, to poorer recognition and recording by sickbay medics and, if so, diagnosis and management might be improved by the introduction of better facilities for telemedicine and computer-assisted diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. AcknowledgementWe wish to acknowledge the valuable assistance of Captain Michael Loxton RAN, Leading Seaman M Berry RANR, Ms Roisin Alexander, Defence Library Service, and Dr Dorothy Coote, Defence Health Service. Air Vice Marshal Bruce Short (SGADF) and Air Commodore Tony Austin (DGDHS) granted permission to access the data and provided valuable advice in its interpretation. References
Commander Mike O'Connor is Vice President of the Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and chairs the Chapter of Military Obstetrics and Gynaecology. He has been a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist to the RAN since 1982. He has appointments at St George public and private hospitals in Sydney and is chairman of the Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at St George Private Hospital. He has served on HMAS Stalwart, HMAS Tobruk and HMAS Manoora, the last being as support for pregnant refugees during the Tampa crisis in 2001. He has also served in Bougainville and East Timor. Commander Mark Parrish has served in the Royal Navy and the Royal Australian Navy from the Antarctic to the Arabian Gulf. He was responsible for establishing and deploying with the Primary Casualty Reception Facility aboard HMAS Manoora and Kanimbla and, on leaving the Navy, has managed public and private hospitals.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW.Mike O'Connor, MBBS(Hons), MD, DCH, DDU, FRCOG, FRANZCOG, Consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist, RAN. School of Underwater Medicine, HMAS Penguin, Balmoral, NSW.Mark J Parrish, MBBCh(Hons), FRACGP, MRCGP, DipOccMed,MHA, Correspondence: CMDR M O'Connor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George Hospital, PO Box 185, Kogarah, NSW 2217. celticdr@bigpond.net.au
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||