The Chief of Air Force, Air Marshal Geoff Shepherd,
is accountable for delivering Air Force Capability.
When I became the Chief of Air Force in July 2005, I delivered four
key messages to develop and support the Air Force to achieve its goals
in a productive, professional and efficient way. Outlined below are
the Air Force's achievements during 2005–06
that are consistent with each of the four messages.
"We will be an Air Force focused on achieving operational
and governance excellence—we will be the best that we can be,
with what we have, here and now".
The Air Force provided, and continued to develop, the capabilities
to conduct offensive and defensive counter-air operations, land and
maritime strike operations, offensive air support, support for combat
operations, wide and focal area surveillance, maritime patrol and response,
search and rescue, and tactical and strategic airlift, including aeromedical
evacuation, as outlined below in our professional outcomes.
Domestically, the Air Force conducted border control initiatives in
the north of Australia. The Air Lift and Combat Support Groups made
substantial and important contributions to the relief effort, Operation
Larry Assist, following the cyclone that devastated parts of north Queensland.
The Air Combat and Surveillance and Response Groups conducted defensive
counter air operations in support of Operation Acolyte, supporting the
Melbourne Commonwealth Games. No. 41 Wing deployed a new Tactical Air
Defence Radar System and communications suite to a remote site in the
Melbourne hills to collect surveillance information which was fed back
to the Aerospace Battle Management network and subsequently fed to the
fighter aircraft on combat air patrol over Melbourne. The P-3 Orion
flew over 1,000 missions in support of surveillance of Australia's sea
approaches in Operation Relex II.
Regionally and internationally, the Air Force supported Operations
Catalyst, Slipper, Citadel, Spire, Astute, Anode, Bali Assist II, and
Pakistan Assist. The deployment of C-130 Hercules aircraft in the Middle
East Area of Operations continued throughout the year, having now amassed
more than 1,000 air logistic support and aeromedical evacuation missions
since the initial deployment. The P-3 Orion aircraft continued their
intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance role in the Middle East
Area of Operations, flying almost 900 missions since operations began.
In addition, the Air Lift and Combat Support Groups made substantial
and important contributions to humanitarian and disaster relief activities
in the aftermath of the Bali bombings in October 2005 and Operation
Pakistan Assist in November 2005. Combat Support Group also provided
specialist airbase support to deployed forces in Timor-Leste, Solomon
Islands and the Middle East Area of Operations. Notably, the Air Traffic
Control detachment at Balad Air Base in Iraq returned to Australia after
completing its mission.
The capacity to sustain operations and training was maintained through
an extensive support activity. Delivery of capability was successfully
supported by the generation of officers, airmen and airwomen through
our training organisations.
"We will continue to be a values-based Air Force, with people
at the core of our capabilities and our concern. Above all else, we
will value our Values".
The Air Force's values-based culture is demonstrated through continued
good recruiting achievements and healthy retention rates. We rely on
our people to deliver capability and achieve the Government's outcomes.
The year was characterised by high operational tempo in support of operations,
disaster assistance and recovery, resulting in increasing pressure on
our people. The men and women of the Air Force once again rose magnificently
to the challenge.
"We will keep an eye on our vision and seek innovative means
to achieve it".
A number of enhancements to the F/A-18 are under way as part of the
Hornet Upgrade Program to ensure continued air combat capability in
the lead up to the planned withdrawal of the F-111. The air combat transition
plan underwent detailed development and Australian participation in
the Joint Strike Fighter program was further refined. The first F/A-18
with avionic enhancements was accepted into service in 2006, while the
long-range Joint Air-to-Surface Stand-off Missile and improved short-range
Joint Direct Attack Munition were selected as part of the program.
Detailed planning for the introduction of the C-17 Globemaster III
began and planning for the introduction of the Wedgetail Airborne Early
Warning and Control aircraft and the Multi-Role Tanker Transport aircraft
continued with both aircraft flying for the first time in 2005–06.
"We will join together in the pursuit of Exciting, Enjoyable
Professionalism."
The dedication and professionalism of Air Force airmen and airwomen
and our reputation features in accolades from within Australia and from
our friends and allies overseas. The Air Force is rightly regarded as
being among the world's most capable and professional forces, commensurate
with size, by our major allies.
Safety is of great concern to Air Force members and the Directorate
of Defence Aviation and Air Force Safety continued to develop a number
of strategies to enhance the integration of safety into everyday culture.
In particular, the Directorate conducted a number of safety related
courses to ensure individuals were equipped with the necessary knowledge
and tools to support the RAAFSAFE Safety Management System.
The Air Force team has met the challenges put to them over the past
12 months and has successfully delivered Government outcomes. The high
standard of results achieved truly reflects the approach to work of
all Air Force people, whether they be permanent members, reservists,
or civilians.
Capability Performance Information
Output 4.1 Capability for Air Combat Operations
Air Combat Group is responsible for the provision of air combat capability
for the Air Force, including F/A-18 and F-111 aircraft, crews, weapon
systems and support infrastructure to deliver the required capability
to sustain air control, maritime and land strike, offensive air support
and limited reconnaissance roles. Hawk Lead-In Fighter aircraft and
PC-9 Forward Air Control training aircraft also contribute to this capability.
Output 4.2 Capability for Combat Support of Air Operations
The Combat Support Group provides operational support to expeditionary
air bases within Australia and overseas.
Output 4.3 Capability for Surveillance and Response Operations
The Air Force's capability for surveillance and maritime response operations
is provided by the Surveillance and Response Group. The provision of
P-3 aircraft, sensors, weapon systems, personnel and battle space management
elements enables intelligence support, surveillance and reconnaissance
operations. In addition, the P-3 Orion can conduct maritime strike,
attack targets underwater and perform search and rescue. Battle space
management elements conduct air defence and airspace control.
Table 2.35 Capability for
Air Combat Operations
| Performance Targets |
Performance |
| Achieve levels of preparedness directed by the Chief of the Defence
Force for military response options with a warning time of less
than 12 months. |
Achieved. Preparedness levels demonstrated through
F/A-18 and F-111 participation in Exercises Kakadu 05, Extendex
05, Red Flag 06, and Operation Acolyte. |
| Achieve levels of training that maintains core skills and professional
standards across all assigned warfare areas. |
Achieved. The Group's training objectives have
been metthrough participation in a number of major exercises. |
| 71 F/A-18—13,000 flying hours |
12,015 hours (92 per cent). Achievement was limited
by issues associated with ageing airframes, upgrade programs and
the capacity of qualified technical staff. |
| 28 F-111 (17 F-111C; 4 RF-111C; and 7 F-111G)—3,500 flying
hours |
3,458 hours (99 per cent). In line with the logistic
support concept, two of the operating F-111G aircraft were placed
in long-term storage during the year, reducing the operating fleet
size to 26 aircraft. |
| 33 Hawk Lead-in Fighter—7,500 flying hours |
403 hours (85 per cent). Ongoing issues with rebalancing
the workforce as well as equipment issues restricted the capacity
to fully achieve the target. |
| 4 PC-9/A (Forward Air Control training role only)—1,030
flying hours |
4 PC-9/A (FAC)—986 hours (96 per cent). This achievement
was a large improvement over the previous year and indicates that
Forward Air Control aircraft serviceability issues are largely rectified. |
Table 2.36 Capability for
Combat Support of Air Operations
| Performance Targets |
Performance |
| Achieve levels of preparedness directed by Chief of the Defence
Force for military response options with a warning time of less
than 12 months. |
Achieved. Preparedness levels demonstrated by
ongoing deployments to the Middle East, and short notice deployments
to the Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste for peacekeeping operations,
and to Pakistan for humanitarian relief operations. |
| Achieve a level of training that maintains core skills and professional
standards in conjunction with Corporate Services and infrastructure
Group and the Defence Materiel Organisation across all operations
support areas. |
Partially achieved. Operational commitments continued
to place significant pressure on training programs. The training
opportunities available to Air Force personnel working in the Corporate
Services and Infrastructure Group were limited by the commercial
restructure of their business practices. Programs are in place to
address the recent lack of collective training needed to maintain
high-end combat support skills. |
Provide the level of preparedness required based on a force structure
of:
- two combat support wings;
- one expeditionary combat support wing;
- one combat Reserve wing;
- one airfield defence wing; and
- one health services wing.
|
Substantially Achieved. The levels of preparedness
continued to be impacted by overseas operational commitments. The
amalgamation of two combat support wings into one has been completed,
placing all operational airbases under a single combat support wing.
This is expected to enhance the command and control, standardisation
and efficiency of these bases and contribute to the rebalance of
Air Force capability. The combat Reserve wing was transferred to
Training Command on 1 January 2006. |
Table 2.37 Capability for
Surveillance and Response Operations
| Performance Targets |
Performance |
| Achieve levels of preparedness directed by the Chief of the Defence
Force for military response options with a warning time of less
than 12 months. |
Achieved. Preparedness targets were met or exceeded,
as demonstrated by ongoing operational commitments to Operations
Slipper, Catalyst, Relex II, Acolyte and Astute. Achievements included
deployments of small air traffic control elements to the Middle
East and Timor-Leste and the deployment of a TPS77 surveillance
radar at the Melbourne Commonwealth Games. |
| Achieve levels of training that maintains core skills and professional
standards across all assigned warfare areas. |
Achieved. While delivering core skills, the high
operational tempo placed significant pressure in some areas. In
particular, 92 Wing was constrained in its capacity to complete
all non-core training activities. |
| Maintain the Jindalee Over the Horizon Radar Network. |
Achieved. The Jindalee Operational Radar Network
operated for the full year and supported ongoing research and development
and surveillance activities. |
| 19 P-3 Orion aircraft—8,200 flying hours. |
19 P-3 Orion aircraft—7,418 hours (90 per cent).
Achievement was limited by ongoing operational commitments and reduced
availability of technical staff due to operations in multiple locations. |
Output 4.4 Capability for Airlift Operations
The Air Lift Group provides airlift capability in support of operations.
This includes airlift aircraft, crews and weapon systems providing air
logistics support, airborne operations, aeromedical evacuation, special
operations, search and survivor assistance, VIP flights, air-to-air
refuelling, navigator training and surveillance operations.
Table 2.38 Capability for
Airlift Operations
| Performance Targets |
Performance |
| Achieve levels of preparedness directed by the Chief of the Defence
Force for military response options with a warning time of less
than 12 months. |
Achieved. Preparedness was demonstrated across
all Air Lift Group platforms by continued and sustained deployments
to the Middle East Area of Operations as well as rapid and sustained
responses to numerous ADF and humanitarian operations including
Operations Acolyte, Larry Assist, Anode and Astute. |
| Achieve levels of training that maintains core skills and professional
standards across all assigned warfare areas. |
Achieved. Air Lift Group's core training objectives
were achieved but some non-core training events were delayed by
operational requirements. |
| 24 C-130 Hercules—14,000 flying hours. |
24 C-130—13,149 hours (94 per cent). Achievement
was limited due to operational and post-operational commitments,
secondment of personnel to support the introduction of the C-17
Globemaster and implementation of upgrade programs. |
| 4 B-707—1,400 flying hours. |
4 B707—1,289 hours (92 per cent). Achievement
was limited by the age of the aircraft, which affected aircraft
availability and the cancellation of some tasks. |
| 14 DHC-4 Caribou—4,100 flying hours |
14 DHC-4—3,282 hours (80 per cent). Aircraft serviceability
and logistic facility issues contributed to the underachievement. |
| 2 B-737 BBJ—1,200 flying hours. |
2 BBJ—1,273 hours (106 per cent). Overachievement
resulted from higher than anticipated tasking. |
| 3 CL604 Challenger—2,400 flying hours. |
3 CL604—1,934 hours (81 per cent). Lower tasking
and damage to one aircraft in the early part of the year contributed
to the underachievement. |
| 8 B300 Beechcraft Kingair Navigator Training aircraft—4,200
flying hours. |
8 B300—4,457 hours (106 per cent). Overachievement
reflects the earlier than planned completion of aircraft modifications. |
| 2 PA34 Seneca—793 flying hours. |
2 PA34—690 hours (87 per cent). To overcome transitional
B300 issues, two PA34 Seneca were leased to conduct the initial
ten sorties of the Navigator/Observer training curriculum. This
ceased in December 2005 due to satisfactory early completion of
the training program. |
Cost to Government
Table 2.39 Outcome Four—Air
Force Capability for the Defence of Australia and its Interests
| |
Budget Estimate(1) |
Additional Estimate(2) |
Actual Result |
Variation(3) |
Variation(3) |
| |
2005–06 |
2005–06 |
2005–06 |
2005–06 |
2005–06 |
| |
$'000 |
$'000 |
$'000 |
$'000 |
% |
| Goods and services |
43,883 |
130,828 |
174,395 |
43,567 |
33.3 |
| Interest |
– |
– |
12 |
12 |
– |
| Other revenue |
46,768 |
65,823 |
30,726 |
–35,097 |
–53.3 |
| Total Revenue |
90,651 |
196,651 |
205,133 |
8,482 |
4.3 |
| Net foreign exchange Gains |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
| Assets now recognised |
13,829 |
99,552 |
183,805 |
84,253 |
84.6 |
| Net gains from sale of assets |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
| Other gains |
– |
– |
3,813 |
3,813 |
– |
| Total Gains |
13,829 |
99,552 |
187,618 |
88,066 |
88.5 |
| Total Income |
104,480 |
296,203 |
392,751 |
96,548 |
32.6 |
| Employees |
1,475,647 |
1,439,437 |
1,428,458 |
–10,979 |
–0.8 |
| Suppliers |
2,191,900 |
2,233,489 |
2,113,955 |
–119,533 |
–5.4 |
| Grants |
282 |
1,535 |
1,220 |
–315 |
–20.5 |
| Finance Cost |
7,478 |
6,365 |
19,948 |
13,583 |
213.4 |
| Depreciation and amortisation |
1,056,379 |
1,172,537 |
1,208,528 |
35,991 |
3.1 |
| Write down and impairment of assets |
27,695 |
117,710 |
218,549 |
100,839 |
85.7 |
| Net foreign exchange losses |
– |
– |
14 |
14 |
– |
| Net losses from sale of assets |
– |
3,695 |
1,587 |
–2,108 |
–57.0 |
| Other expenses |
– |
3,815 |
758 |
–3,058 |
–80.1 |
| Total Expenses |
4,759,381 |
4,978,582 |
4,993,016 |
14,434 |
0.3 |
| Price to Government for Outcome Four |
4,654,901 |
4,682,380 |
4,600,266 |
–82,114 |
–1.8 |
Notes:
- Budget Estimates are consistent with Portfolio Budget Statements
2005–06 (page 151).
- Additional Estimates are consistent with Portfolio Additional
Estimates Statements 2005–06
(pages 100 and 101).
- Variations reflect the difference between Additional Estimates
and Actuals.
Table 2.40 Breakdown of Outcome
Four by Output
| |
Budget Estimate(1) |
Additional Estimate(2) |
Actual Result |
Variation(3) |
Variation(3) |
| |
2005–06 |
2005–06 |
2005–06 |
2005–06 |
2005–06 |
| |
$'000 |
$'000 |
$'000 |
$'000 |
% |
| Output 4.1—Capability for Air Combat Operations |
1,769,462 |
1,768,420 |
1,790,833 |
22,413 |
1.3 |
| Output 4.2—Capability for Combat Support of Air Operations |
761,662 |
776,988 |
741,906 |
–35,083 |
–4.5 |
| Output 4.3—Capability for Surveillance and Response Operations |
1,104,931 |
1,132,277 |
1,081,070 |
–51,206 |
–4.5 |
| Output 4.4—Capability for Airlift Operations |
1,018,846 |
1,004,695 |
986,457 |
–18,237 |
–1.8 |
| Price to Government for Outcome Four |
4,654,901 |
4,682,380 |
4,600,266 |
–82,114 |
–1.8 |
Notes:
- Budget Estimates are consistent with Portfolio Budget Statements
2005–06 (page 155).
- Additional Estimates are consistent with Portfolio Additional
Estimates Statements 2005–06
(page 101).
- Variations reflect the difference between Additional Estimates
and Actuals.
Back to top