Annual Report 2004-05Contents | Index | Glossary | Help | Contact | Download | Copyright | Privacy |Chapters: Overview | Capital Budget | People | Outcome Performance | Group Contributions | Defence Materiel Organisation | Appendices |
||
| Appendices | Internal Audit and Risk Management Arrangements | Internal Audit | Ethics Awareness and Fraud Control | Portfolio Evaluations | Enterprise Risk Management | | Appendices > Internal Audit and Risk Management Arrangements > page 3 of 4 | |
| |
Internal Audit and Risk Management ArrangementsPortfolio EvaluationsPortfolio Evaluation StrategyThe Defence Portfolio Evaluation Strategy is promulgated as a Defence Instruction (General). In accordance with that strategy, the Defence Committee authorised a schedule of portfolio evaluations covering 2004-05 and 2005-06. In accordance with the Secretary's priorities, the Defence Committee revised the foreshadowed list of topics. The principal evaluation topics for calendar year 2005, in order of priority, are now:
Topics foreshadowed for calendar year 2006 in the Portfolio Budget Statements 2005-06, in order of priority, are:
Schedule of Portfolio-level Evaluations for 2004-05The following evaluation activities were completed in 2004-05: Preparation of ADF Officers for Joint Appointments. This evaluation, to examine the effectiveness of the ADF's current arrangements to prepare officers to command and serve on war-fighting joint headquarters, was provided to the Chief of the Defence Force and the Secretary in July 2005 and found that:
The Effectiveness of the Defence Customer-Supplier Model. This evaluation, to examine the efficiency, effectiveness, and appropriateness of Defence's customer-supplier model, was completed in July 2005 and found that:
Defence Civilian Performance Schemes. This evaluation, to examine the operation of the performance schemes and to assess the application of the intended behavioural changes, was provided to the Secretary and the Chief of the Defence Force in February 2005 and found that:
The Secretary and the Chief of the Defence Force have accepted the evaluation's recommendations and plans have been developed to implement them. |
||
| | | « Previous | Home | Next » | | ||