Annual Report 2004-05Contents | Index | Glossary | Help | Contact | Download | Copyright | Privacy |Chapters: Overview | Capital Budget | People | Outcome Performance | Group Contributions | Defence Materiel Organisation | Appendices |
||
| Chapter Three - People | Workforce Overview | Performance Against People Matter Priorities for 2004-05 | Non-Operational Training | Workplace Equity and Diversity | Effectiveness of Investigations and Complaints Handling | Overview | Unacceptable Behaviour | Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force | Director of Military Prosecutions | Judge Advocate General | Alternative Dispute Resolution | Redress of Grievance and Review of Actions | Service Police | Compensation for Detriment caused by Defective Administration | Defence Whistleblower Scheme | Occupational Health and Safety | Performance Pay | Annual Report on the Administration and Operation of the Defence Force (Home Loans Assistance) Act 1990 | | Chapter Three - People > Effectiveness of Investigations and Complaints Handling > page 1 of 12 | |
| |
Effectiveness of Investigations and Complaints HandlingOverviewOn 16 June 2005, the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee tabled its report on its inquiry into the effectiveness of Australia's military justice system. The Government tabled its response to the report on 5 October 2005. The Government has agreed to significant changes to strengthen the existing military justice system. In all, 30 of the Senate Committee's 40 recommendations were accepted in whole, in part or in principle. In addition, the Government announced alternative solutions to achieve the intent of the Report's recommendations that were not agreed. The new system is designed to deliver impartial, rigorous and fair outcomes through enhanced external oversight, greater transparency and improved timeliness while, at the same time, ensuring that the ADF can maintain effective discipline and, through that, the operational effectiveness that has been and continues to be its hallmark. Importantly, the essential elements of the military justice system will be independent of the ADF chains of command. The first stage of legislative changes to give effect to the Government's recent reforms has been introduced into Parliament. These relate to, inter alia, the statutory appointments of the Inspector-General of the ADF, the Director of Military Prosecutions and the Registrar if Military Justice. The key measures agreed by Government include:
As part of the reform program, $3.5m per annum initially will be allocated to adequately resource these initiatives and 35 new positions will be created - including the appointment of two new permanent military judge advocates. The Government has asked Defence to implement these recommendations and enhancements within two years, and to report to the Senate Committee twice a year throughout the implementation period. Two of the recommendations related to annual reporting on the implementation and effectiveness of reforms to the military justice system and the workload and effectiveness of various bodies within the system. The information provided in relation to the effectiveness of investigations and complaints handling represents Defence's initial commitment to reporting on the state of health of the military justice system and on complaints processes relating to civilian employees of Defence. |
||
| | | « Previous | Home | Next » | | ||