skip to navigation skip to content skip to footer

PFAS Investigation &
Management Program

News & Media

Media Enquiries

Media enquiries should be directed to the Defence media centre on (02) 6127 1999 or email

Responses to Journalists

2018 Responses

2017 Responses

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

2016 Responses

December 2016

November 2016

October 2016

September 2016

August 2016

July 2016

June 2016

Releases, Corrections & Statements

Australian Government Media Releases

Corrections to the Record

Defence Statements

Four Corners PFAS Program

Defence is committed to being open and transparent about its management of environmental investigations and remediation efforts at PFAS affected Defence Bases and in communities.

In keeping with this commitment Defence invited the ABC Australia’s Four Corners program to visit RAAF Base Williamtown on the fourth of October. Defence hosted the visit and participated in an hour long interview with Four Corners, addressing every question regarding PFAS contamination.

A statement regarding the Four Corners PFAS Program, including a full transcript of the Four Corners interview with Steve Grzeskowiak, Deputy Secretary Estate and Infrastructure Group, is available below.

1987 Tindal Environmental Contingency Plan

The Department of Defence commissioned an Environmental Management Plan for the operation of RAAF Base Tindal in 1987. This plan consisted of ten task-specific management plans, including the Environmental Contingency Plan, prepared by Kinhill Engineers Pty Ltd.

The Environmental Contingency Plan contemplated the risk and mitigation for 19 different contingency events, including release of firefighting foam to the environment. Appendix F to the plan included procedural requirements for foam systems published by the Department of Housing and Construction and information about the foam published by 3M.

The plan was concerned primarily with the collection and proper treatment of foam residues, recognising that the release of large amounts of foam to the environment would cause adverse effects because foam can suffocate living organisms. Based on the scientific understanding of the time, the plan stated that “AFFF and its components are not considered to be dangerous substances, nor are they harmful to the aquatic environment after proper treatment” and “Because of the small proportion of fluorocarbons in AFFF and of the high degree of dilution during treatment and in receiving waters, fluorocarbons are not significant environmental contaminants”.

The plan did not provide any advice regarding the potential for long range environmental transport of PFAS, nor its persistence in the environment or propensity to bioaccumulate. The science on those aspects was not developed at that time.

Defence now understands that the recommended methods of treating firefighting foam in sewage treatment plants did not remove PFOS and other persistent chemical residues in the foam.

A copy of the full plan is available below.